10+ Best Global Payroll Services for International Companies

• Deel consolidates HR, IT, and payroll processes into a single platform, reducing the need for multiple systems.
• Its workflows and automation free up time for HR staff, allowing them to focus more on employee engagement rather than administrative tasks.
• The platform is cost-effective, and the time savings provide a strong return on investment.

As a global organization, one of our biggest challenges has been incorporating the unique requirements of the countries we operate in while maintaining a system that works across different regulations.

Deel has evolved into a robust platform that supports compliance in multiple countries, making it an ideal solution for our needs. It also simplifies global payroll, allowing us to pay employees and contractors anytime, anywhere.

With recent advancements in the platform, we can do even more at a reasonable price while benefiting from an integrated system. Since adopting Deel over a year ago, we have successfully streamlined multiple processes into a single platform.

• Deel is a complex system, which may not be suitable for all businesses.
• Due to its complexity, it requires extensive training and experience to use it effectively.
• The user interface has a learning curve and could benefit from additional improvements in usability and navigation.

Deel stands out because of its comprehensive features, covering multiple aspects of HR, payroll, and global workforce management. While similar tools tend to specialize in specific areas, such as payroll or HR data management, Deel offers a wide range of modules that address nearly every HR and operations need in one platform.

One of the most overlooked aspects of selecting a platform like Deel is post-implementation customer support. Many issues arise after deployment, so it’s crucial to research the level of ongoing support provided.

Also, consider any hidden costs for features that may not be included upfront but could become necessary later. Evaluating the full range of available features—even those you don’t need right now—can help ensure the tool remains valuable as your business scales.

Deel continues to expand its platform, adding new features to support the evolving needs of HR and operations teams. The company actively enhances its offerings to provide more comprehensive workforce management solutions.

Deel is ideal for medium to large businesses with a global workforce or those that frequently hire contract workers. It is particularly valuable for companies that do not have entities in every country where they employ workers, as Deel can serve as an Employer of Record (EOR) in such cases.

• Ease of use - ability to learn how to use the system in a day
• You are able to contract from over 100 countries in remote.com
• Reporting is clear and easy to understand

As a small organization we were looking to hire many contractors in various countries. Remote.com is extremely easy to use and makes hiring internationally simple. I have been using Remote.com since March 2023.

• Customer service was not helpful and very rude. I had to get a manager involved.
• The system is not very robust. It really is just a payment and time tracking services system, any organization would need an employee performance management system.
• The integrations are underdeveloped and could be improved.

This is the first contractor tool that I have used, and I am very impressed. Remote.com does everything we need so I do not see us needing to switch to a different product.

I think people should assess what countries they need to hire contractors in, and make sure that remote.com is able to hire in those countries. Furthermore the cost of remote.com is pretty reasonable for the price that it costs.

I have not really seen a difference since I have been using it since March 2023. I will say that the reporting is great and I am always happy to improve my process while using it.

Companies with multiple contract workers

Pricing flexibility was great and affordable for smaller enterprises. The representatives and customer service staff were very knowledgeable and experienced, offering excellent guidance and a can-do attitude, which was very welcome as we had become bogged down in red tape. We liked that there were very relevant add-on services that could be used on an ad-hoc basis.

We bought Papaya Global because we were expanding internationally. Our business meant that we had small offices and remote workers in many countries. It was time-consuming and error-prone to individually pay staff in so many countries. We needed a tool that could centralize global payroll and pay multiple international staff seamlessly and effortlessly, and Papaya Global did this. I used it for about a year.

It would have been good if they had a solution for 50 to 100 employees. We had to take the minimum 100-employee tariff even though we initially had fewer than 100 employees. Reporting could be improved; I found that the invoices were a little low on detail. It is a bit more expensive than the competition.

I have used other similar tools, and while a little more expensive, I found that this one has better global coverage and a more comprehensive service offering.

Consider global coverage, e.g., what countries they serve and if they have a depth of knowledge and expertise. Ensure it has a good and efficient global payroll service at its core, but also has the appropriate add-on services (like EOR, global payments, contractor payments) so you can quickly adapt to changing business circumstances.

I think the library and knowledge base have grown substantially, providing more on-demand information and advice about global payments.

Papaya Global is good for any international organization with employees in multiple countries.

1. Global Compliance Ease: Multiplier simplifies compliance with international labor laws, making it much easier to manage our diverse global workforce.
2. Efficient Payroll Processing: It streamlines payroll operations across different countries, ensuring timely and accurate payments.
3. Robust Employee Management: Multiplier provides comprehensive tools for onboarding, benefits management, and maintaining employee records, enhancing HR operations.

LMC adopted Multiplier to streamline the complexities of managing a diverse, international workforce. With crews and support staff based globally, we needed a solution to handle payroll, compliance, and employee management across different countries. Multiplier was introduced over two years ago to address these challenges effectively. It has been instrumental in ensuring compliance with local labor laws, simplifying payroll processes, and managing employee benefits efficiently. The ability to onboard international employees without setting up local entities has been particularly beneficial, enhancing our operational flexibility and reducing administrative overhead.

1. Complex Interface: The user interface can be complex and less intuitive, requiring a steeper learning curve for new users.
2. Limited Customization Options: Some features lack the flexibility to be fully customized to meet the specific needs of our global operations.
3. Response Times: Customer support response times can be slow, especially during critical payroll and compliance deadlines.

Multiplier stands out primarily due to its comprehensive handling of international labor compliance and the ability to manage payroll and HR functions across multiple countries without the need to establish local entities. Unlike other HR platforms that focus primarily on either payroll or compliance, Multiplier integrates these services seamlessly, which is particularly beneficial for companies like Liberty Maritime Corporation that operate globally. Its one-stop solution for international employment management makes it preferable for businesses looking to expand or maintain a global workforce.

1. Global Compliance: Ensure the tool efficiently manages compliance with international labor laws, crucial for companies operating across borders.
2. Integration Capabilities: Look for a platform that seamlessly integrates with your existing HR and payroll systems to streamline processes.
3. Scalability: The tool should grow with your business, handling increases in employee numbers and geographic expansion without performance issues.

The platform has significantly improved its user interface to simplify navigation and reduce complexity. Additionally, it has expanded its customization options to better cater to the diverse needs of various industries and enhanced its integration capabilities with other HR tools for a more cohesive user experience.

It is ideal for businesses expanding internationally that need to onboard, pay, and manage employees across multiple jurisdictions efficiently. This makes it valuable for companies in industries such as technology, shipping, and consulting, where flexibility and compliance are critical.

• I appreciate ADP's user-friendly interface to simplify complex HR processes.
• ADP's robust reporting capabilities provide valuable insights for strategic decision-making.
• The scalability of ADP allows seamless adaptation to the evolving needs of our growing organization.

One of the primary reasons ADP was selected was its reputation as a reliable HR solution provider. The platform is known for its ability to streamline payroll processes, manage employee benefits effectively, and ensure compliance with changing regulations.

Additionally, ADP's scalability was a crucial factor. It accommodated the evolving needs of our workforce and provided the flexibility to handle increased employee numbers.

• I find occasional glitches in the user interface of ADP frustrating.
• The limitations in customization options can be restrictive for our specific needs.
• There's a concern about potential increased costs as our organization grows with the continued use of ADP.

ADP user-friendly interface makes HR tasks more accessible for our team, and the reporting features provide insights into workforce analytics. Also, the customer support from ADP has been consistently responsive and helpful.

Consider the tool's functionality to ensure it aligns with your HR needs, evaluate scalability for future growth, and assess integration capabilities with existing systems. You will need to scrutinize compliance, security, and the total cost of ownership. Additionally, research the vendor's reputation, inquire about the product's upgrade plans, and take advantage of trial periods to assess real-world performance before making a final decision.

ADP has evolved to meet user needs by enhancing its user interface and expanding its features to address a broader range of HR requirements. This would include payroll processing, benefits administration, and talent management. ADP's scalability has improved, accommodating the diverse needs of both small businesses and large enterprises. The platform's increased integration capabilities enable seamless connectivity with other systems, enhancing overall workflow. Over time, ADP has embraced mobile accessibility, allowing users to manage HR tasks remotely, reflecting its adaptability to changing work dynamics.

In my experience ADP is adaptable to the specific needs of growing companies. It is an excellent choice for users seeking a comprehensive HR solution, encompassing payroll processing, benefits administration, time and attendance tracking, and talent management. The platform is beneficial for those who prioritize user-friendly interfaces that require robust compliance features and reliable customer support. ADP is a valuable and supportive HR management solution.

• It is excellent for handling EOR, contractor, and employee payrolls in a single system.
• The platform is relatively easy for employees to navigate.
• Customer service is responsive and helpful when issues arise.

I originally purchased Rippling to serve as an Employer of Record (EOR) for international employees. I later migrated our HRIS to Rippling for U.S.-based employees as well. I have used Rippling for EOR functions since 2023 and for U.S. employees since early 2024.

One of the key benefits is the ability to pay both international and domestic employees through a single system. This has simplified payroll operations and improved overall administrative efficiency.

• The integration process was lengthy and difficult; our rep moved to a different country during implementation, delaying the hiring of two international employees by two months.
• There was an attempt to increase our negotiated monthly cost, though they honored the original rate once I provided documentation.
• Benefit integration is more manual than expected unless an additional service is purchased, which we do not currently find cost-effective.

Rippling offers a broad range of features and services in one platform. While its coverage is impressive, I would prefer to see more included functionality without additional fees.

If the goal is primarily payroll, Rippling is a strong option. If you need a fully comprehensive HRIS, there are other platforms that offer more robust features.

Rippling has added more countries to its EOR program and continues to expand device and IT services. The system has become more user-friendly, and its add-on services support the goal of an all-in-one solution, although these come at an additional cost.

Rippling is well-suited for small to mid-sized organizations with 10 to 150 employees.

• Globalization Partners is user-friendly and makes it easy to access and apply the available resources.
• It supports currency conversion from USD to local currencies and enables payment to foreign financial institutions.
• The onboarding support provided to workers was strong and helped build confidence within our team.

Our company had contractors and local staff in war-torn countries where we were helping to rebuild infrastructure. It was critical that HR remained aware of all governing laws and regulations to ensure full compliance with compensation and benefits. We also needed to maintain equitable, competitive, and sustainable compensation strategies across the entity.

Globalization Partners was our primary resource to ensure we understood and adhered to current employment rules and regulations. We also required a way to compensate workers in their local currencies. I used the tool for approximately one year.

• Cost could be a concern for some companies, as Globalization Partners is not among the least expensive EOR services.
• Support for workers with questions about benefits and compensation would be helpful, rather than having them rely on a small internal team.
• It was sometimes difficult to receive quick answers to more complex or non-standard situations.

I have used other similar tools and found Globalization Partners to be a dependable and reliable resource. I would recommend them to others with expanding teams in multiple countries.

• I would not recommend this EOR for small organizations with only one or two foreign nationals.
• To achieve a high return on investment, this tool is best suited for mid- to large-sized international organizations.
• It is important to assess the scope of your global hiring needs before committing to a provider like Globalization Partners.

I only used Globalization Partners for about a year, so I have not experienced or observed significant changes during that time.

Globalization Partners is well-suited for service providers engaging local foreign nationals as part of their workforce.

Because service providers often do not require physical offices in the countries where they operate, it can be more difficult to become a qualified employer locally, making this tool particularly helpful.

• It is easy to navigate and use, allowing me to efficiently manage schedules and track employee time without extensive training.
• The automation features, such as scheduling and time tracking, save me considerable time and reduce manual errors, ensuring smoother operations.
• It provides detailed reports on attendance, overtime, and scheduling metrics, empowering me to make informed decisions and optimize workforce management strategies effectively.

We implemented TFY due to the manual processes in the organization that were causing inefficiencies, specifically with scheduling and time tracking. These processes were time-consuming and prone to errors, frequently leading to payroll discrepancies. TFY allowed us to automate tasks and create optimized schedules quickly and efficiently. It has robust time tracking, which has significantly improved accuracy in employee hours, payroll, and overall operational efficiency. It has streamlined our workforce management, removed administrative tasks, and allowed us to focus more on strategic initiatives and employee productivity.

• Sometimes the customization options for specific scheduling rules or reporting formats can feel restrictive, making it less adaptable to unique organizational needs.
• Integrating with other existing systems or software can be complex and may require additional technical support to ensure seamless operation and data consistency across platforms.
• At times, the response time from the customer support team could be improved, especially during urgent situations or when needing assistance with complex issues that require immediate resolution.

It is easier to use than competitors and provides a much more streamlined approach, ensuring operational efficiency.

Prioritize functionality—evaluate whether the tool covers critical areas such as scheduling, time tracking, and reporting comprehensively. Assess the user interface for ease of use, as this impacts adoption rates and training requirements. Then look for customization options that align with your organization's unique workflows and policies. Integration capabilities with existing systems should also be a priority to streamline operations and data management. Also, evaluate the vendor's support services and maintenance to ensure ongoing reliability and assistance when needed. Taking these factors into account will help you choose a tool that enhances operational efficiency and meets long-term business objectives.

I’ve heard there are regular updates to provide the most up-to-date system, but not sure about the specifics as I haven’t used for a long time.

Small to medium companies can find TFY useful.

It is user friendly. It is easy to teach it to employees outside of our Human Resources department. There are so many features!

We bought Workday to ensure we had a financial system that would work with our HR systems. This helped us accurately run payroll. We use this Workday for storing the employee information, such personal details, previous employment details and contact details. It helps to track the goal setting to yearly appraisal feedback. We can easily be able to track the compensation revision history as well. It is a highly secured website. It requires a password + additional two security questions to login. This ensures the additional safety of the data.

It can be confusing to navigate at times. That is partially the software itself but more so how our team decided to set everything up. We are still adding more and more and making this process better for our users.

I would consider it very similar to Paycom. I would recommend Paycom over Workday by a slight margin.

Workday is an excellent choice if you are the owner of a business with 250 to 1,000-plus employees and require workforce management tools (onboarding and training, scheduling and leave management), as well as HR analytics tools (pay management and performance evaluation and management)

It has evolved to take on more employees with little effort.

Human Resources, Management, Financial Department

The primary benefit lies in the enhancement of the employee experience, introducing a newfound level of autonomy for our non-U.S. employees. Additionally, Oyster offers seamless service, excellent communication, and significant time and cost savings. Utilizing Oyster costs less than engaging external consultants for equivalent services. Its ease of use has integrated it seamlessly into our business strategies.

I've had experience with Oyster at a previous company. The service operates seamlessly, boasting excellent communication, and notably saves both time and costs. Utilizing Oyster comes at a lower expense compared to engaging external consultants for similar services. The most significant benefit lies in the enhancement of the employee experience. Oyster introduces a level of autonomy previously unavailable to our non-U.S. employees.

While Oyster excels at generating basic reports such as payroll, invoices, and expenses, its reporting capabilities are limited beyond these functions. Unlike other HR tools that offer insightful charts, customizable filters, and robust data exploration features for identifying hiring trends, benchmarking team productivity, or analyzing retention rates, Oyster falls short. This deficiency in advanced reporting may frustrate businesses focused on optimizing costs, improving time-to-fill metrics, and establishing a global talent pipeline. While workarounds are available—such as exporting report data for analysis in Excel or data visualization tools—they entail additional effort.

Oyster collaborates with third-party vendors to provide payroll and HR services in certain countries where it lacks a direct presence. While this expands Oyster's support for more locations, it also introduces potential inconsistencies in user experience. Working with partners may incur higher costs, offer less transparency, and result in longer wait times compared to dealing directly with Oyster.

Oyster is easy to use but has limitations when compared to some of its competitors from what I learned while researching online.

Pricing, types of employee engagement that the purchaser is needing, and the size of the company.

I’m unsure of how WorkTango changed or evolved over time.

Oyster very good for hiring, onboarding, and payroll, and for companies that does these activities a lot.

I liked the reliable customer-centric focus of the Atlas team. I could count on their compliance and global regulatory guidance. I liked the cost-benefit.

We used Atlas HXM for three years. My company had cross-border employees, both inside and outside of the US. A pain point for them was maintaining one database, one source of truth for their employee records, and needing the flexibility to hire people quickly in new global regions. The key benefit of Atlas was that they were the employer of record, which was better than a PEO, saving me a lot of time setting up employer and other tax-related accounts. It is a good system and an alternative to the big players who are only interested in the bottom line. Customer-focused system.

It lacks flexibility in customized functionality. They could improve their customer support response time (but it wasn't bad considering the time zone differential). They could reduce costs or provide more incentives for smaller businesses or startups.

I have used many similar tools. Atlas HXM is truly a global provider! From Western to Eastern Europe, they are everywhere! I preferred this system over others because I could rely on them consistently in areas of global rules and regulations I was unfamiliar with.

Are you in need of a global employer of record for your business? How many countries do you have employees in? Do you struggle to keep current with global compliance at your company?

I haven't seen many changes, but since they are small, I assume evolution will happen quickly.

Global entities with cross-border employees.