• I like Oyster because it simplifies global compliance by managing local employment laws, taxes, and benefits.
• The platform is intuitive for onboarding and managing international employees.
• Their support team is responsive and provides helpful resources for global hiring best practices.

Oyster was considered to streamline international hiring and manage global employment compliance efficiently. It enabled us to confidently hire talent in new markets without the need to set up local entities, saving significant time and reducing legal risk.

The platform makes it easy to onboard international team members, manage their contracts, and comply with local regulations. These benefits addressed our need for a scalable and compliant global hiring solution.

• The cost can be relatively high.
• The system is complex, requiring dedicated time with the onboarding specialist to ensure each feature is utilized effectively.
• Some features may take time to fully understand without hands-on guidance.

Oyster stands out from competitors like Rippling due to its strong focus on global compliance and user experience. Compared to other EOR platforms we’ve used, Oyster offers more transparent pricing and better country-specific insights.

Their support team is more responsive and knowledgeable about international employment regulations. I also value the localized benefits recommendations, which help us remain competitive in global hiring. Overall, Oyster acts more like a strategic partner than a standard service provider.

When buying a global employment tool like Oyster, it's important to assess its compliance capabilities—make sure the provider has expertise in local labor laws and tax requirements in your target countries. Customer support quality is also crucial; verify that the team is responsive and knowledgeable.

Look for pricing transparency to avoid unexpected costs. Finally, evaluate how quickly the provider can onboard employees in new regions, especially if your organization is scaling rapidly.

Oyster has evolved significantly to support the growing demands of a global workforce. They have expanded their country coverage and improved onboarding speed, making it easier to hire talent in more regions with reduced delays.

Oyster is well-suited for large organizations that frequently hire internationally.

• Oyster provides strong global compliance and employment expertise.
• The international onboarding process is fast and efficient.
• Payroll management across different currencies is reliable and flexible.
• The benefits administration tools help attract and retain global talent.
• The platform includes useful analytics and reporting.
• Customer support is responsive and knowledgeable.
• The product evolves based on user feedback.

Our organization was expanding globally and needed help navigating international compliance and employment regulations. With a small HR team of just three people, we lacked the in-house expertise to manage international hiring effectively.

Oyster helped us solve those challenges with a platform that covers global compliance, onboarding, payroll, and benefits. It gave us the support we needed without having to hire additional staff.

The company has been using Oyster for over a year, and it has become an essential part of our HR operations.

• The cost can be high, especially for smaller companies.
• Integration options with other HR or business tools are limited.
• Time tracking and performance features are basic.
• Customization options are minimal.
• Learning and development tools are underdeveloped.
• Absence management is limited compared to specialized platforms.
• The mobile app lacks some functionality available on desktop.
• Document management features are very basic.

I haven’t used other tools like this before, so I can’t directly compare it with competitors.

When choosing a tool like Oyster, consider your specific HR needs and how well the platform addresses them. Budget is important, but you should also think about how the tool integrates with your current systems. For us, compatibility with our existing setup was key. Be clear on the problems you're trying to solve so the solution aligns with your goals.

We have only used Oyster for about a year, so I’m not sure if any significant changes were made to the platform.

Oyster is well-suited for global or fast-growing companies, especially in industries like manufacturing, where international hiring is common.

The interface is user-friendly and well-organized, making it easy to navigate. Oyster allows the HR team to focus more on strategic initiatives rather than administrative tasks. The platform offers comprehensive support for global payroll and compliance, ensuring accuracy and efficiency.

Our organization purchased Oyster to address the complexities of managing a global remote workforce, particularly in payroll, compliance, and benefits administration. Before implementing Oyster, we faced challenges navigating various international labor laws and ensuring timely, accurate payroll across different regions.

Oyster's intuitive platform has streamlined payroll processing, simplified onboarding, and ensured compliance with local regulations. The tool offers end-to-end support, including tax filings and benefits management, giving us confidence that we are meeting legal requirements in every market where we operate.

I have been using Oyster for over a year, and it has significantly reduced the administrative workload for our HR team, allowing us to focus on strategic initiatives. While the platform may seem complex for smaller companies, it has been invaluable in helping our organization scale efficiently and confidently.

Support response times can vary by region, with some areas experiencing slower service. The platform can feel complex for smaller companies that may not require all of its features. Some customization options for payroll reports could be improved to better fit unique business needs.

Oyster has simplified the payroll process for our global workforce and has helped us scale with confidence. Compared to other solutions, it offers a more comprehensive and reliable approach for managing remote and distributed teams. The platform’s focus on compliance and ease of use makes it stand out from competitors with more complex interfaces.

• Global Workforce: If your company employs staff across multiple countries, Oyster excels at managing payroll and compliance for international teams.
• Compliance Needs: The platform helps ensure compliance with local labor laws, tax filings, and benefits administration.
• Onboarding and Payroll Automation: Oyster simplifies the entire onboarding process for remote employees, saving time and effort.
• User-Friendliness: The intuitive design makes it accessible for HR teams of all experience levels.
• Cost Considerations: Larger organizations with significant international operations will benefit the most from Oyster's features and scalability.

Oyster has evolved significantly to meet the growing demands of remote work and global teams. Initially focused on payroll and compliance, the platform has rapidly expanded its features to include enhanced benefits administration and improved reporting tools based on user feedback.

Oyster is ideal for companies with remote or distributed workforces, fast-growing startups, mid-sized to large enterprises, and organizations expanding into new international markets. It is especially beneficial for HR teams that require streamlined payroll and compliance solutions.

Personally, Oyster is one of the better platforms. I appreciate how it emphasizes the importance of compliance. Since we were a global company, Oyster's functions allowed us to stay compliant with city laws, state laws, and federal regulations. Its onboarding functions are excellent.

Onboarding can often become messy with global companies, but Oyster streamlined the process. When it came to customer support, we felt confident because their team was easy to contact and provided helpful tools and resources.

I was with my previous employer for a 9-month temporary contract. We used Oyster as a "catch-all" platform for Human Resources and Talent Acquisition. The platform allowed us to source, onboard, and maintain personnel records.

While I was on that contract, I worked between both teams, which gave me a good grasp of the platform's functions, and I enjoyed using it. From my understanding, they implemented Oyster shortly before I joined because of a company shift that required HR and TA to work more collaboratively.

I don’t have many cons, but there are a few. Their reporting functions are not the best; for a platform that is so advanced, the reporting features are basic and require more manual work.

Additionally, the reliance on third-party services, which many companies use, can sometimes cause issues. When working with third-party vendors, processes can become messy and more time-consuming than necessary.

I have worked with similar tools in the past, and I can confidently say that I prefer Oyster. The platform operates efficiently and simplifies tasks for HR and TA functions. Its features are user-friendly and make our roles easier.

Companies and teams should assess whether they truly need this type of platform—just because it offers a lot doesn’t mean it’s the right fit for everyone. Since it is somewhat expensive, I would advise teams to carefully evaluate their needs before committing to a platform like Oyster.

Oyster did not change significantly during my time using it. It remained consistent throughout my contract role. However, due to the platform’s modern features and design, I felt it didn’t require much change.

Oyster is well-suited for HR and TA teams with 20+ members, especially companies that operate globally.

I like the compliance laws offered between countries. The platform setup is easy to navigate. Oyster has great tools for new employees to learn how to use the software. Hiring remote workers anywhere in the world is a wonderful tool.

We spent a lot of time hiring employees outside of the USA and had to contact our law team to ensure laws from every country were being handled correctly. We were using three different programs that were time-consuming and hard to teach new staff members to use. We purchased Oyster to streamline our processes onto one platform. As a large company that hires worldwide, Oyster allowed us to set up employee information efficiently. An easy onboarding and hiring process was a key reason for purchasing this program.

Customer service can be complex sometimes. Getting an agent is time-consuming. The initial onboarding emails can be confusing at times. The rising cost is a con as well.

Having used a few programs, I can say that Oyster's laws and requirements are easily accessible, which is a step up from competitors. I prefer this program over a few different ones I have used.

They need to consider what their onboarding process consists of and if the program is a good fit. They also need to consider what compliances they have versus other countries' requirements. I feel that a prospective purchaser needs to meet with the sales team to ensure Oyster will be a successful tool.

Oyster has improved the smoothness of learning the program. They have also kept up with day-to-day changes in laws and requirements.

Oyster can be great for large companies that hire globally.

The interface was intuitive, so even employees who were not tech-savvy could use it. There is a built-in time zone coordination feature, which is perfect for international team alignment. It made scheduling easy. Customer service was exemplary. I think they probably had 24/7 people on call because we never had to wait "till tomorrow" for a reply.

We set up an account with Oyster about four years ago and used it for about two years. We were expanding rapidly and needed a workforce from countries with lower salary rates to be more economically efficient. We did not want to go through the hassle of setting up entities in different countries, and our HR team did not feel confident we could do it in-house and remain compliant. So, we outsourced this service. The platform's ability to handle international payroll has been a game changer.

Cost. We dropped it because of the cost; it simply made no sense for us to use such a pricey platform. If the company had been developing as fast as we hoped, we might have stayed with them, but not under the circumstances we had. There were also some limitations with the integrations, and we could not lose some of the other platforms we were using for other aspects of people management. I also would have liked to see more customization; the system was rather robust and did not allow finesse.

Oyster stood out from its competitors mainly because of its top-notch compliance management across countries, which was a game changer for us. Many other tools don't cover this as thoroughly. I also found Oyster's interface incredibly user-friendly, which isn't something I can say about all the HR platforms I've tried—some of them feel like navigating a spaceship. One special thing I really appreciated is how it helps with time zone coordination; it's a small detail, but it makes scheduling across a global team much easier.

Other than the compliance aspect, look for a user-friendly interface that makes daily operations smooth and straightforward. It is important to evaluate the integration capabilities with your existing HR systems to avoid tech compatibility issues. Lastly, consider the quality of customer support, as having reliable, real-time assistance can save you a lot of trouble down the line and is a reason clients would walk away.

Initially, Oyster was mainly about helping companies hire and stay compliant with local laws globally. Over time, they added stronger payroll management features, making it easier to pay employees accurately and on time, which goes hand in hand with the first service. They also kept working on the interface and the integrations.

Oyster is perfect for companies that want to hire talent from all over the world without getting bogged down by local labor laws and payroll hassles. It is ideal for startups looking to grow quickly and mid-sized businesses expanding their global footprint.

It is very easy to use. The country-based information guides are well-researched and helpful. The onboarding process is slick and pain-free.

My organization was struggling to get reliable resources in overseas locations. Freelancers did not stay around long enough and were expensive. The organization wanted to reduce salary costs and increase staff retention by hiring actual employees instead of freelancers.

However, we were only hiring one or two employees in multiple locations, so it didn't make financial sense to establish an offshore legal entity. We needed to use an Employer of Record service to quickly and efficiently employ staff offshore. We wanted to convert some of our freelancers to employees as well.

Oyster impressed us as it offered this service in a unique SaaS format, making it transparent, quick, and great for remote collaboration. I have been using it for about six months and appreciate the easy onboarding process, cost calculator, and HR information per country, which is great for planning.

We have converted several existing freelancers to local employees and hired multiple employees into the local EOR entities via Oyster's one-stop-shop service.

I wish there was more information and guidance on offboarding. Some help with finding talent could be useful. Integration with sites like Upwork for contracting to hire via Oyster would be beneficial.

It's a one-stop-shop SaaS digital service, whereas I have used more analog organizations. I prefer the Oyster model as it's better for remote collaboration across different time zones.

People should consider cost and ease of use when buying this type of tool. Additionally, the global HR information guides provided are crucial to successful offshoring.

They have evolved into a one-stop global payroll tool that can save a lot of time if you have many workers in different locations that need to be paid.

Organizations that have good HR knowledge but want to hire just a few staff (1 to 5) in multiple locations around the world will find Oyster to be the best fit.

I like the user experience. I like that the platform takes a fun approach (not cookie-cutter). I really love that I can set up a page for each country we do business in but have all the pages in one portal.

Our organization had many pain points as a startup. We needed the flexibility to hire people outside of the US quickly. Oyster was super user-friendly and was a wonderful EOR for us. I can't say enough nice things about their product and people! I have personally used them for just over a year.

Cons of having an EOR (or a PEO) are that we have less control over growing costs year over year (especially benefits costs - you are pretty much stuck with their recommendations). Another disadvantage of Oyster is the detailed customization usually wanted in smaller businesses. The cost of the tool is also steep.

Oyster is different from Atlas, for example, in the user interface. Oyster is more fun to use! In HR, so much of what we do is serious, urgent, and complex - high stress. This tool makes the work a bit more enjoyable.

Do you need an EOR? Have you researched EOR versus PEO, and why is an EOR more of a fit for your company?

They seem to be making continual improvements. Not stagnant.

Oyster can be a great fit for a company with employees, contractors, or vendors in multiple countries worldwide.

The primary benefit lies in the enhancement of the employee experience, introducing a newfound level of autonomy for our non-U.S. employees. Additionally, Oyster offers seamless service, excellent communication, and significant time and cost savings. Utilizing Oyster costs less than engaging external consultants for equivalent services. Its ease of use has integrated it seamlessly into our business strategies.

I've had experience with Oyster at a previous company. The service operates seamlessly, boasting excellent communication, and notably saves both time and costs. Utilizing Oyster comes at a lower expense compared to engaging external consultants for similar services. The most significant benefit lies in the enhancement of the employee experience. Oyster introduces a level of autonomy previously unavailable to our non-U.S. employees.

While Oyster excels at generating basic reports such as payroll, invoices, and expenses, its reporting capabilities are limited beyond these functions. Unlike other HR tools that offer insightful charts, customizable filters, and robust data exploration features for identifying hiring trends, benchmarking team productivity, or analyzing retention rates, Oyster falls short. This deficiency in advanced reporting may frustrate businesses focused on optimizing costs, improving time-to-fill metrics, and establishing a global talent pipeline. While workarounds are available—such as exporting report data for analysis in Excel or data visualization tools—they entail additional effort.

Oyster collaborates with third-party vendors to provide payroll and HR services in certain countries where it lacks a direct presence. While this expands Oyster's support for more locations, it also introduces potential inconsistencies in user experience. Working with partners may incur higher costs, offer less transparency, and result in longer wait times compared to dealing directly with Oyster.

Oyster is easy to use but has limitations when compared to some of its competitors from what I learned while researching online.

Pricing, types of employee engagement that the purchaser is needing, and the size of the company.

I’m unsure of how WorkTango changed or evolved over time.

Oyster very good for hiring, onboarding, and payroll, and for companies that does these activities a lot.

• Great interface which creates a very positive experience while using the tool.
• Easy to stay compliant to local labor laws.
• Easy onboarding process for new clients.

I helped a client to develop a nearshore consulting practice in South America.

Oyster definitely makes it easy to hire and manage employees abroad, which can be a challenging task due to labor laws intricacies. I have only used the tool during this project’s duration (1 month), but my experience was very positive.

• I wish there were more subscription package options available.
• The cost can be a barrier for startups.
• The resource tools are very helpful, however I’ve identified a couple of inaccuracies in some of the country guides.

Easy and efficient onboarding process.

Ensure that your internal processes are well defined, so you can meet the monthly deadlines to share your company’s information.

Analyze if the solution fits your needs, I’d highly recommend using the free trial that they offer.

Evolution and adaptability are definitely key characteristics when offering a global payroll solution, given the challenge that is to ensure compliance to the labor law complexities of some countries.

Companies that are starting to test or implement a workforce globalization project.