Top-Rated HRIS Systems: Reviews & Comparisons in Q2/2025

• Their customer service team was always accessible and helpful, allowing me to quickly talk to an expert to address any needs. This was especially valuable since I didn’t have other "superusers" on my team.
• I appreciated the variety of reports available to run and export, enabling us to develop Paylocity as the "source of truth" for employee data and integrate it with external databases and spreadsheets.
• I liked the ability to house asynchronous professional learning modules within the system. When training was only required for specific roles, we could assign it to select users; for universal training, we could make it a requirement for all.

My organization moved to Paylocity from ADP in 2018. I used it for four years as a manager, then began running payroll and supervising managers approving time and payroll for two years. Paylocity offered us the ability to run more sophisticated reporting, integrate HR functions, and manage employee training for an organization of 500 employees.

• Paylocity has a wide range of capabilities, but each section is designed slightly differently, making navigation between sections (e.g., time and labor to payroll) less intuitive.
• Although I could easily reach the support team, the representative assigned to our organization was not always available, so there was a lack of continuity in my interactions with someone who could help me build expertise.
• I became a more frequent and experienced Paylocity user about two years into our tenure with them, missing much of the initial onboarding. Due to staff turnover, some institutional knowledge was lost. Although their online user guides were helpful, it would have been beneficial to have a structured sequence of guides or an orientation tailored to different aspects of the platform to support ongoing learning.

Paylocity is excellent for large or rapidly scaling organizations. I appreciate the vast amount of information it can store and export and its versatility in being used across multiple departments, including talent, HR, finance, payroll, and development.

When considering Paylocity, think about the size of your organization, the price point (as it may be a more expensive option), and how you intend to use it, as there are many features to choose from.

Also, consider what other systems you use and whether you want to migrate functions like time tracking or learning into Paylocity, keep them separate, or integrate them.

Their support options have expanded to meet diverse user needs. You can call for support, email, use the community forum, or access user guides.

Paylocity is best suited for larger organizations seeking a scalable platform that can serve as a comprehensive solution for organizational needs.

• BambooHR is easy to use and train employees on. BambooHR makes it very easy to create offer letters and email templates when it comes to recruiting.
• BambooHR makes it easy to recruit and keep track of candidates, and the stages they are in in the interview process.
• The BambooHR 'how can we help button' makes it super easy when you have a problem or a question to get a resolution.

We are a small organization with roughly only 25 employees but we need a tool that could do it all. When making this decision we compared tools that could sit as an ATS system combined with an HRIS system. Not only can BambooHR fit in those factors, it can also have benefits and payroll implemented in their system if we wanted to stop using our other payroll system. We have been using BambooHR since March 2023 but I had used it at a prior organization so that was an easy decision to move forward with it.

• I wish BambooHR let you have candidate scorecards when recruiting.
• BambooHR makes it easy to create onboarding documents but it does not always simplify the packets for each job function.
• I wish BambooHR had the ability to open and close jobs more fluidly similar to Greenhouse - multiple openings in one job code for tracking purposes.

BambooHR is a great product for a small growing organization that needs a product to do it all. Because we have a limited budget we needed to find an ATS that could also onboard and fit as a people management system. I think that BambooHR is cheaper and easier to use.

When buying a tool like BambooHR I think they should consider price (this was our number one driving factor), and scalability. As we continue to grow, BambooHR will be able to grow with us.

BambooHR has evolved over the years since I last used it. They have developed their reporting capabilities, added payroll and benefits to their system, as well as created a system to organize a 'talent pool'.

BambooHR is good for a company with less than 400 employees that is looking to grow their organization, and manage current employees.

• It allows us to easily input time off.
• Provides easy redirects to benefits links.
• Displays a company-wide news feed.

We bought Bob for our talent management and employee management needs. We have used it for 1.5 years. It allows employees to easily view their time off and provides redirects to links for benefits and payroll information. The main issue our organization aimed to solve was finding a more affordable talent management tool.

• Limitations in its capabilities as an applicant tracking system (ATS).
• Limited functionality in managing the recruiting funnel.
• Does not have its own benefits portal.

• Employee-Centric Approach: Unlike many HR platforms that prioritize administrative functions, Bob enhances the employee experience with tools like recognition, surveys, and social features.
• Flexible for Modern Work Environments: Bob is tailored for hybrid and remote work setups, offering intuitive tools for managing distributed teams and fostering collaboration.
• Cultural Insights: Bob’s "People Analytics" dashboard tracks workforce engagement and provides insights to strengthen organizational culture.
• Global Reach: Bob supports global operations with localized compliance and multi-country payroll integrations, appealing to multinational companies.

Consider your company size—Bob is more suited for mid-sized to large organizations. Assess whether your industry operates remotely or in person; Bob is ideal for remote or hybrid setups. Finally, review your current integrations and tools, as Bob is focused on enhancing the employee experience rather than serving as an ATS or HRIS system.

• Learning Management System (LMS): The introduction of Bob Learning equips organizations with tools for managing employee development and continuous learning.
• UK Payroll Integration: HiBob expanded payroll functionality with a modern approach to payroll management for UK-based employees.
• Workforce Planning Module: This feature facilitates planning for scenarios such as reorganizations and mergers, aiding strategic decision-making.
• 1-on-1 Meeting Feature: HiBob introduced templates for onboarding, goal setting, performance reviews, career growth, and regular check-ins to strengthen manager-employee relationships.

• Mid-Sized to Large Organizations: Bob is ideal for companies with 100 to 5,000 employees, offering advanced functionalities for managing larger teams.
• Global Organizations: Bob’s multi-country support and compliance features make it a great fit for multinational companies.
• Companies Prioritizing Employee Engagement: Bob’s tools for goal setting, performance reviews, and social recognition foster strong workplace culture and employee retention.
• Tech-Savvy, Forward-Thinking Teams: Bob’s sleek, intuitive interface appeals to organizations that value modern, user-friendly platforms.
• Organizations with Hybrid or Remote Workforces: Bob supports collaboration and communication in flexible work environments.
• HR Teams Seeking Data-Driven Insights: Its analytics capabilities provide valuable data for decision-making regarding employee performance and organizational health.

• I like that you can use one platform to run multiple payrolls for different countries.
• I like that they make hiring contractors in other countries easier.
• I like that they make understanding other countries' payroll and employment laws easy with all sorts of helpful resources.

Our small start-up company of under 50 employees was looking to hire international consultants in various areas, mainly Canada, Brazil, and later Poland and Ireland. We've used Deel for about 2 years now mainly for contract management and international payroll, and used their PEO and Employer of Record services as well. The key benefit is being able to hire great talent outside of the US and being protected and advised around payroll and employment laws for various countries.

• I dislike their reporting function as it's essentially just Excel and doesn't allow for advanced filtering/reporting.
• I dislike that the integration with Rippling is a bit wonky. Some employee info will flow in, but not all.
• I dislike that making changes in contracts can be difficult and that the e-signature capability is not great.

I believe that Deel is the best in class in terms of international hiring/payroll/compliance/PEO. They have a great team behind getting the system of hiring set up in each individual country. Their customer service is really great and they are great consultants that help you meet your goals. If you use their PEO or Employer of Record service it can be costly depending on where you're hiring.

• Location of Hiring - Depending on where you're hiring, Deel may not support that region so it's important to take a look at which areas they cover. They do cover most major areas of international hiring.
• Cost - Overall it's an affordable and effective system for international payroll. It does sit outside of the HRIS ( if you use one) so that's something to think about as an additional cost.
• HRIS Compatibility - It's also important to think about the compatibility with your HRIS, otherwise you have a lot of data sitting outside of your HRIS which you can manually upload through CSV reports.

In the time that I used Deel, they developed their PEO availability regions. I believe they do a good job at customer listening, and their team is extremely attentive.

Deel is great for small to medium-sized businesses that are looking to quickly expand internationally. It's also important to note that in each new location you're hiring in, if you're looking to have a hiring hub of 20+ more employees in that particular company, using Deel may only be a short-term solution. But for quick hires, small hiring hubs, and hiring consultants across countries, it's a great platform.

• The software is intuitive—we have some team members who are slow to learn but have picked it up quickly.
• It enhances collaboration by enabling file sharing within projects and providing real-time updates.
• Automation templates made it easy to get started building our workflows and task automation.

The team was experiencing issues with project delays and workflow, especially with assignments not being passed smoothly between members and difficulty in tracking progress. We needed to be more efficient and organized. We started using Monday.com over a year ago, and it has provided a centralized platform for project management, greatly improving coordination among team members. By automating repetitive tasks, it has freed up time for strategic and creative activities. As a result, our project tracking has become more precise and easier to manage.

• The software is expensive, especially for smaller companies.
• Upgrading is necessary to access the time-tracking features.
• There is no built-in messaging function; while we have a workaround, it can be somewhat cumbersome.

I’ve also used Basecamp. I prefer Monday.com over it. The project tracking is better, and the automated workflows fit the needs of the company better.

Cost is an important factor to consider, particularly with per-user fees, which can become expensive as your team grows. Evaluate the software's pricing structure and how it fits within your budget. Additionally, make sure that the software integrates with the essential tools (calendars, etc.) you use in your daily operations.

We haven't seen many updates that impact our usage of it since we've only been using it for a little over a year.

It's great for digital teams, especially those who don't meet face-to-face often.

Paycor had a simple interface that was easy to navigate. We were pleased with its all-in-one HRIS solution, which replaced multiple separate systems we had previously integrated. It was a cost-effective solution for a business of our size.

We used Paycor at a previous organization I worked for. We selected it over competitors because we felt it was the best fit for the size of our organization (about 200 employees). The main reason we chose it was to use it as an all-in-one solution for HRIS. We used it for approximately four years.

Customer service at Paycor left a lot to be desired after implementation. There were extra fees for special requests that were not explained upfront. Annual renewals became more expensive over the years.

It is a cost-effective solution compared to many competitors. Reports are customizable and easy to generate. With some other HRIS tools, report generation was more difficult. Since implementation, customer service has been lacking.

Other HRIS providers tend to emphasize customer service and client partnerships more. Paycor met our needs at the time, but more robust systems would better serve larger organizations.

There are a few key factors to consider when purchasing an HRIS/payroll tool. One is customer service and how well the provider supports your organization after the sale. This is especially important for small organizations that rely on strong customer support to save time.

Cost is another factor, but pricing may vary depending on the organization's size, with some providers offering significant discounts for larger businesses.

Organizations should also clarify their specific needs by creating lists of "must-haves," "nice-to-haves," and "not needed" features. This helps avoid paying for unnecessary functionality and can serve as a bargaining tool during negotiations.

During the time I used it, I observed that they kept up to date with wage and labor laws by state, which was crucial for compliance. Over the four years I used it, they implemented software updates to ensure the system functioned smoothly. Although we did not use this feature, they added integration capabilities with other tools over time.

Paycor is well-suited for mid-sized businesses that have HR experts on staff and need an easy-to-use tool.

The interface is slick and easy to use. It offers flexible and expandable HR and benefits tools, meaning it can grow with the business. The streamlined and partially automated PTO with self-service is also good.

We bought OnPay to streamline our payroll process. Our HR and finance teams were too small and preoccupied with rapid growth activities to manage payroll, and as a result, mistakes were being made. The monthly payroll process was analog, without much automation, and quite inefficient and laborious. We wanted to have a more automated and online process, which OnPay provided.

OnPay is genuinely focused on small businesses. The interface is clean and simple, not overloaded with features like those found in big company payroll tools. It connects directly with our timesheets, allows staff to update their personal data, and has streamlined and mostly automated our payroll process. We have used this tool for a couple of years.

The design is a little boring and old-fashioned. The reporting section is a bit awkward to use. It doesn't have great support for international customers.

The design is a little boring and old-fashioned. The reporting section is a bit awkward to use. It doesn't have great support for international customers.

Can you also pay contractors through the system? Can you pay staff according to different pay schedules?

We haven’t used it long enough to answer this.

US-based SMEs without international offices can benefit from OnPay.

• The user interface is easy to navigate and use.
• The biggest advantage for me is the automation features, as they save me a lot of time by reducing manual work.
• The reporting and analytics tools provide valuable insights.

We primarily purchased this tool to address inefficiencies in managing HR processes. We needed a solution to handle employee records, time tracking, payroll, and performance management without juggling multiple platforms.

Factorial HR worked well as an all-in-one platform and also offers automation and workflow rules for these processes. Additionally, its data analytics capabilities were a great and unexpected benefit. We have used it for roughly three years. The tool also has a user-friendly interface.

• Some of the integrations, like the payroll integration, can be tedious at times and do not always work as expected.
• The customization options for reports are limited.
• Customer support for complex issues has been difficult to manage, and response times could be improved.

Factorial HR stands out for its simplicity and ease of use compared to more complex HR systems like BambooHR or Workday. It successfully offers strong HR features without excessive complexity. The best part is that it doesn’t require a dedicated tech team to manage the software.

Consider the size of your company. This tool is great for small to medium-sized businesses. If you need software with extensive integrations, you may want to explore other options. If connecting to your payroll system via integration is a priority, another solution might be a better fit. However, if you need something simple and easy to use, this is a great choice.

Factorial HR has introduced more automation features and improved its reporting capabilities over time. One major benefit I’ve noticed is the expansion of its compliance and document management features, which better support remote and international teams. This is extremely important for my team due to the nature of our remote and hybrid workforce.

Factorial HR is ideal for small to mid-sized businesses looking for an easy-to-use, affordable solution. Startups and growing businesses will particularly benefit from its automation features and user-friendly design.

• Rippling is an all-in-one platform that manages the entire employee journey, from interviewing to offboarding.
• It has direct integrations with Carta.
• It offers a seamless payroll process through its flexible benefits platform.

We adopted Rippling in 2021 as a small tech startup with fewer than 15 people, seeking a solution to manage essential HR functions without a dedicated HR or Finance team member. We needed software that could efficiently handle payroll, onboarding, and offboarding while ensuring compliance with local and federal laws and regulations.

Over the past three years, we have expanded our use of Rippling to include its recruiting platform and ASO services, which provide enhanced support for federal and state filings and reporting. Most recently, to integrate benefit deductions seamlessly into payroll, we appointed Rippling as our Broker of Record and began using its Flexible Benefits module.

• The support process can be overly complex and too dependent on AI.
• The Recruiting Module does not allow the exclusion of specific job boards, such as Indeed, which often results in a high-volume but low-quality applicant pool.
• Rippling’s step-by-step wizard makes it difficult to view entire processes, like employee offboarding, in one comprehensive view.

Rippling is a robust all-in-one platform that has consolidated services we previously outsourced. Before using Rippling, we managed separate vendors for applicant tracking and flexible benefits administration. Rippling has enabled us to bring all these functions together in a single, integrated system.

Companies should evaluate whether they prefer an all-in-one system or specialized tools that integrate throughout the employee lifecycle. It’s important to assess the team's capacity and willingness to learn and manage the platform. While Rippling is intuitive, it requires a time investment to fully leverage its features.

During our time with Rippling, we have seen enhancements to the recruiting platform, including improved resume screening and stronger communication automation.

Rippling has introduced customizable workflows and in-platform app customization options, allowing us to tailor the platform to our needs. Its expanded support and compliance features led us to adopt its ASO service in early 2025.

Rippling is ideal for companies seeking a strong, user-friendly, all-in-one HRIS solution. It provides value even for users without payroll or HR expertise due to its intuitive interface.

It suits small to mid-sized businesses and is especially beneficial for companies with remote teams or global employees, as it includes device management and global payroll features.

• User-friendly: The platform’s user experience and design ensure that you don't feel overwhelmed while working.
• Comprehensive: Lanteria makes managing the entire HR lifecycle simple.
• Seamless integration: Lanteria allows for a smooth integration process, making it easy to add new features over time.

I worked at a fashion startup in the HR department. We researched various HR platforms to find one that fit our needs and preferences. Lanteria met and exceeded our expectations for an HR platform. While I was on contract with this startup, we implemented the platform in February 2023, and it is still in use today. Lanteria provides a wide range of resources to meet a company's needs.

While my team and I prefer this platform, we believe Lanteria’s technical support could be improved, given the broad range of features. The integration support, both during and after implementation, needs to be more robust so customers feel supported throughout their experience.

Lanteria stands out from its competitors because it offers a wide range of features at a reasonable price. I also believe Lanteria is a better option because it can work well for companies of various sizes, team dynamics, and industry sectors.

People should carefully evaluate any HR platform before selecting one, as these systems handle sensitive information. Before choosing Lanteria, I recommend ensuring that its integration options align with your company’s needs and confirming that you will use all of the services it offers, as the platform provides various features.

Lanteria has evolved to meet its customers’ needs by offering more services, such as learning management, performance tracking, and more.

Lanteria is well-suited for most organizations but is particularly good for companies with 200 or fewer employees.

I like Sage People,

• as it has many features for example it generates extremely comprehensive and complete reports.
• as it has tools that allow me to batch-load data in a very easy and practical way.
• because it has very complete and functional support available to the user.

The tool was acquired for the registration database of employees. It was necessary to have a tool that could globally attend several countries. The tool had to be integrated with several applications like slack, DocuSign, financial force, etc. The system needs to be very complete in terms of reports and automation. I have been using the system for more than 1 year and 3 months.

Despite being complete the system has some limitations and in some countries with specific legislation is difficult to adapt to local rules. I can say that the system is quite complex and therefore some activities are quite difficult to perform and require some steps of attention.

I can say that the system has a lot of integrations with several other applications and platforms. Sage also stands out for its complete functionality in terms of reports. I also see the support offered to understand the system as a great differential, it is very complete.

Take into consideration a tool that can be globally adapted to many countries. Consider a tool that is widely possible to connect to other human resources applications and systems such as benefits, payroll, and other applications. Also, consider a tool that is easy to use and has a potential range of reports to generate.

I highlight that SAGE has released an updated version that can be used in parallel to the classic version, they call it Lightening with a more modern interface and some improved features.

In my point of view this tool is ideal for global organizations, with a human resources department that looks and takes care of your database and needs consistency and a reliable system with the ability to manage large volumes of data and generate practical reports and dashboards and requires integration with other internal systems in the company.

Some of the pros of UKG are that we can easily transfer information from the applicant profile to create the employee profile with no additional steps. Another pro is the ability for our employees to clock in and out easily from their mobile devices. Lastly, our benefits and payroll are also processed within UKG, making it a more convenient process for our organization.

We purchased UKG in 2019 to help streamline our hiring process, onboarding, and payroll system. Some of the benefits of UKG include being an all-in-one hiring, onboarding, and payroll system. I am one of the administrators of our UKG system, so I use it extensively. I am very proficient in what the system can offer, along with its downsides. The tool has significantly improved our operational efficiency since its implementation.

Some cons we have found with UKG include not being fully HR compliant; for a couple of years, we have not been able to properly run our EEO-1 reports. We use UKG to complete our I-9s and E-Verify, but that is not without constant issues. Some reporting capabilities hinder us from gathering information conveniently, often requiring us to manually maneuver the reports. Lastly, the system undergoes quarterly updates; however, each update often causes another issue in UKG, which we are not notified about until we submit a ticket. This causes many problems and makes us lose faith in new updates.

Many of their competitors are now all-in-one systems, so there isn't much difference in that aspect. Some improvements are needed to make it a perfect system, but the mobile ability for employees makes it very convenient for our staff to clock in and out from various work locations, differentiating it from its competitors.

The criteria that people should think about when buying this tool include the price; it is not an inexpensive tool, especially if purchasing all of the extended platform options such as the advanced scheduler and the leave or training modules. If a full HR compliance system is needed without manipulating the data, this system may be problematic.

UKG consistently updates its system to make improvements. They try to listen to their customers and work on ensuring they meet our needs.

UKG is best for an organization that needs a basic HRIS system.

It was easy to learn and navigate so everyone enjoyed using it.

It is customizable which is particularly helpful in creating individualized onboarding plans.

Information is easy to access, and data is readily available for managers, such as upcoming tasks and events, employee information, and employee feedback.

We chose Sapling to improve our onboarding. We had gotten feedback from staff that onboarding was not well coordinated. We also had more recent hire turnover than we felt was acceptable, and that it was likely connected to onboarding. We had problems establishing not just the critical first few days but also the introductory 90-day experience in which relationships are formed, the tone is set and the groundwork for long-term employment is established. We used it for a year.

It would be nicer to see some data within the platform, rather than having it generated as a report you open outside the system.

The org chart was a bit cumbersome to use.

More resources for employee experience after onboarding available would improve it.

The guidance Sapling provides to managers regarding onboarding seems unique and much more in-depth than other products. For onboarding, I would choose Sapling over other onboarding products and features, as it is very thorough and instructive regarding what onboarding should be.

If you don't hire often, the best part about this product may not be worth the investment. However, if you do have a growing or often changing team, Sapling could be the difference between losing a good new hire in the first 3 months or retaining them for years. So, if turnover is a problem, and if your onboarding has no structure, this is something to seriously consider.

Like any tool, it requires that people buy in and use it for it to accomplish what it sets out to accomplish, so you need to prepare your people for change if introducing a new way to handle onboarding via Sapling.

I believe the product has expanded and now features more performance management options as well.

This is a very good product for growing companies, startups that have a lot of hiring, and companies that need to address turnover issues.

The HR system was easy to use and set up, making the transition from our previous, more disorganized HR processes smooth. The employee self-service feature was excellent, reducing the amount of data entry and admin work for our HR team. The continuous feedback appraisal system allowed us to appraise staff more regularly with minimal increases in administrative tasks.

There wasn’t a significant problem driving the decision. The organization had been managing HR through payroll software, Excel files, and Word documents. As the company grew, it wanted to consolidate and centralize HR into a single system that could be accessed online. Namely provided an all-in-one HR solution that handled payroll, HR records, and talent management. We used Namely for about a year or two.

Customer support wasn’t as responsive as it could have been. The reporting features are somewhat limited and don’t fully meet our needs, requiring us to do a fair amount of manual reporting. The portal is not as intuitive as other HR tools I’ve used.

The user interface and workflow are not as intuitive as some competitors. However, I appreciate the integration with payroll and timesheets, which not many systems do well. I also like that it offers managed services add-ons, such as payroll and benefits, which become more relevant as the business grows and becomes more complex.

Ensure the tool has a comprehensive records system and both employee and manager self-service features. Efficient onboarding and offboarding functionality are essential, as these processes can be time-consuming. A continuous appraisal feedback system is also important, as this approach to performance management is becoming the norm.

There has been better integration between its modules.

Namely is suitable for all kinds of organizations but particularly good for smaller organizations due to its affordable entry-level pricing.