10+ Best Free HR Software for Startups & SMBs in 2025

• Deel is an excellent solution for organizations with international contractors, offering a smooth and simplified process.
• It provides EoR services in over 150 countries and includes additional features like onboarding and time-off tracking for international contractors.

I worked with a company expanding into two international markets as part of a tech stack selection project. My engagement lasted about six months and involved selection, implementation, and change management for onboarding.

Deel is a global payroll solution designed to streamline compensation operations for organizations. The company needed a system to manage international payroll efficiently while ensuring compliance across different regions.

• Deel is only worthwhile if you fit its niche. It can be expensive, and if you don’t have a high volume of international hires, the cost may not be justified.
• If you need a more streamlined international hiring process with lower volume, alternatives like Oyster, Remote, or Papaya may be better options.
• Customer support is lacking.

Deel is uniquely positioned to expedite international hiring, particularly for contractors, seasonal hires, or high-turnover roles. It outperforms most competitors in this area for the price. However, if your needs don’t align with this niche, Deel may not be the best choice.

• What does your international hiring strategy look like, and what types of employees are you hiring?
• What is your budget?
• What HRIS features do you need?

Deel’s primary strength is its extensive EoR services, which have expanded to meet user demand. The company has focused on increasing its EoR coverage in new countries to strengthen its niche. Additional onboarding and benefits features support this strategy, but overall, Deel has not evolved significantly beyond its core offering.

• Companies with high-volume international hiring can benefit from Deel, particularly for contractors or high-turnover roles.
• Organizations managing extensive international payroll and compliance requirements.
• Employers needing to sponsor immigration visas.

1. It is free! The free version of the app provides everything we need to solve our scheduling challenges.
2. It is user-friendly. The web app is great for monthly scheduling, and the mobile app works for our team to view their shifts, etc.
3. It was great that I could begin using it right away. There was no complicated onboarding process or steep learning curve.

I stumbled upon Homebase after a Google search looking for a scheduling tool. It has proven to be invaluable for coordinating the cleanings for my LLC's short-term rentals. Prior to using Homebase, we experienced significant challenges in efficiently managing and organizing the cleaning schedule for multiple properties with multiple members of our cleaning team. It was a time-consuming and error-prone process, resulting in delays and dissatisfaction among the team. We have used it for over three months now and have thoroughly enjoyed using the tool.

1. The system sends a lot of automated notifications (app alerts, emails, text messages).
2. There is a lot more functionality than we use it for, which is frustrating. We don't handle payroll, etc., through the app, but get notifications about these features all the time.
3. Limited customization; I don't need an alert every time there is a scheduling "conflict" because oftentimes one employee will handle the turnover for multiple properties in a given day. I wish I could customize my views, alerts, etc., to better meet our needs.

I have never used other scheduling tools so I'm unsure how it compares.

One thing to think about is how you will handle communication and collaboration. Homebase's communication tools work adequately but aren't very robust. I sometimes get better responses from our team by just texting them, so consider how the tool facilitates communication and collaboration among team members. Look for features such as real-time notifications, messaging capabilities, and the ability to easily share schedule updates and changes.

No changes that I'm aware of.

It's hard to answer this, but it's worked great for us - a small team of people managing short-term rental properties with a small team of people handling the scheduled cleanings for these properties.

• I like the software pricing of the tool, it is cheap to use for business purposes and hence does not affect the ROI of the company.
• I like the chat feature which you can use to broadcast your messages amongst the team at no extra cost.
• Event notifications make sure that our users never miss our internal meetings and events

Connecteam is faster and easier to use, which has helped us solve the problem of team management, team collaborations, and group work, it is helping us to share documents, and work plans with the team remotely, and, also we use it as decision-making tool where we use the chat feature of the software to chat with our team remotely to make important decision makings to our tool. I have used the solution for three years and eight months as an administrator of the software

The software has a lot of video tutorials that play automatically hence creating inconvenience, one should only play the video when needed and with his or her consent.It does not have a calendar integration which makes it hard for one to integrate a calendar within the software to track personal events and business events to prevent event conflicts, the text editor in the tool is too slow when you are creating event descriptions, it is impossible to add the ALT text on images that you add in the tool.

They have kept the pricing relatively lower to help even smaller businesses use the solution, and they have a responsive customer support team through the live chat

Good for HR, team leaders, and marketing teams

Our use of Zoho People was part of a larger bundle that included multiple Zoho systems like CRM, Sign, and Learn. We paid just over $2K monthly for access to these tools, with CRM being heavily utilized by the team.

The main advantage was the cost-effectiveness of the bundled package. If not for that, Zoho People wouldn’t have been our first choice. A user-friendly interface is important to us since our demographic is predominantly millennials, followed by Gen Z.

Ease of use and modern design were key factors in our selection process, which ultimately led us to transition away from Zoho People.

The company I worked for used Zoho People for three years since it aligned with Zoho CRM, a tool the sales team already used. It was the logical choice to stay within the same ecosystem. It also offered many free features that met our initial needs as a startup. As the company grew, we required more advanced functionalities, which eventually led us to transition to a different HRIS system.

The user interface was not as intuitive as other systems I've used as an HR leader. Navigation often felt outdated and clunky. Customization options were limited compared to competitors.

It’s not on my list of preferred HRIS platforms. It does the job and works well for companies just starting out that need a basic system for storing personnel files, providing easy employee access, and offering competitive pricing. From both a backend and user perspective, it’s not ideal. I would still choose other HRIS options like BambooHR or HiBob.

Usability should be the top priority. I’ve launched several HRIS platforms, and at the end of the day, employees need to actually use the system. No matter how great the backend is for HR or how competitive the pricing may be, if the user interface is too complicated, adoption will be a challenge. The system’s overall aesthetic should align with the company’s demographic to support engagement and success.

It improved over the time we used it, but the challenge was that competitors remained ahead of the curve. This made it a tough business decision to stick with Zoho People while waiting for it to catch up. Since we migrated out in December, I’ve noticed significant interface changes, but not enough to make me regret leaving the platform.

Zoho People is a good fit for teams already using Zoho CRM, as it makes sense to keep everything within the same ecosystem. It’s a practical choice for companies looking for a cost-effective, all-in-one solution. I personally think the interface seems to cater more to older generations. It sometimes feels like an elevated version of what AOL Instant Messenger would look like.

• I love that Monday.com helps us stay consistent and on-process.
• Monday.com has been easier to navigate and read than other project management boards. I can easily find comments for tasks and sub-items without them being hidden.
• Monday.com will alert me when I have items due or if a sub-item becomes available due to someone else completing their task.

I am not sure how long we have used Monday.com, but we have been using it since I started with Enterprise Blueprints as a client in 2023. Our organization uses Monday.com across several departments for consistency and organization. We have different workspaces for teams and activities such as onboarding, offboarding, client projects, background checks, and the hiring pipeline. We have one person in leadership who is in charge of connecting all the boards. It seems to be seamless, but it could get complicated if a lot of hands are involved and changing things around. It does take some training before being able to use it correctly.

• Monday.com is not easy to navigate and use without prior training. I can usually pick things up fairly quickly, but I did need help using this project management board. Once you are trained, it is easier to use.
• Changing things in items and sub-items can create a domino effect across boards and items that are connected. This can be a con if you make a mistake in changing an item.
• Although things are very easy to find (such as comments), they can be more difficult to set up compared to boards like Trello.

Monday.com is a basic board with little in the way of custom appearance, unlike Trello, where you can create board backgrounds and appearance. It functions differently than using "cards" and instead uses dynamic lists.

If you are thinking about using Monday.com, you should make sure you have someone open to the task of creating the items and sub-items and ensuring everything is connected and working together. This is not a board that can be used without putting in work to set things up. However, once it is set up, I think it functions better and easier than other PM boards.

I am not sure how Monday.com changed or evolved over time as we have only used the tool for short time.

Monday.com would be good for client service businesses that are small to medium. It could be good for IT businesses as well, though I know that there are more technological PM boards available.

I like it for its smooth performance evaluation process. It's one of my favorite features. Second is its onboarding feature and hires packet that let the new employee feel welcomed. Last but not least, is its ATS system which helps us keep a track of our talent pool.

My organization has been using it for 2 years. This is an amazing tool for employee database management. Along with that, it offers an employee satisfaction survey which can help improve things along the way. Its performance module has made life way easier with a simple few steps process for performance evaluation. Lastly, its hiring module is easy to use and generates results.

It does not provide integration with LinkedIn which adds to the cost of LinkedIn job wrapping. Its customization option is very limited and its API keys are also limited to very few options.

For a startup, It provides all the necessary options that will help the organization alleviate its HRIS system. It is not that costly compared to others and it is also very simple to use.

Apart from the very obvious, cost; another criterion could be the size of the organization. The needs of the organization are also very important in terms of what they want to achieve from an HRIS.

They have introduced new modules like performance, moreover, they are always doing webinars to make the best use of their tool. Their customer support is always very helpful.

Small and Medium Enterprises.

• Better communication through instant messaging, group chats, and video calls. One is in the loop of whatever is going on and gets updates quickly.
• Document sharing option. Every member can share a document, and other members can work on the same document simultaneously.
• Better collaboration. This can mainly be attributed to enhanced communication.

My company was mainly trying to solve issues in relation to collaboration and communication. This has led to increased productivity and improved efficiency. We are able to share documents and properly manage our projects better than before. The tools being offered have streamlined our operations a great deal. I have been using Bitrix for 1.5 years now.

• It can be a bit expensive compared to other similar tools out there. Having regular discounts would go a long way.
• Someone who's not familiar with it will have a really hard time navigating through it. A short introductory video of how it works would really help.
• Technical support varies with the different plans available, and this may cause agitation since the responses they are getting aren't necessarily the ones they're hoping for. I feel like the support should be the same regardless of the package one is using.

It has an inclusive tool where one can do product management, CRM and communication. This means that my organization wouldn't have to use different software to achieve the same results.

Pricing. Because there are different plans, one needs to be sure they get a plan that's within their budget.

Ease of use. One needs to make sure that learning how to use it wouldn't be a problem for its members and they'll navigate easily.

I can confidently say that the enhanced features have improved communication and productivity for its members.

Small-sized business, project management, and customer relationship management.

I like that it has the ability to consolidate multiple features/apps into one software program. I enjoy the "Discuss" feature, which essentially creates a company intranet allowing employees to communicate with others privately or with groups/departments. I also like that it allows me to send documents requiring a signature without having to use another external app, such as DocuSign.

My organization chose Odoo because it is an enterprise resource planning (ERP) software that promises to consolidate and automate several processes. I work for a manufacturing facility that produces food and beverage items, and the processes from creation to delivery of our products include many steps and a lot of paperwork to remain compliant with industry regulations.

We wanted a tool that could be used by several departments, including production, accounting, fulfillment, distribution, and HR. We were hoping we could use Odoo to house our timekeeping, scheduling, and payroll as well. I have been using Odoo for about three months.

I think it is a complex system that requires months of training before it can be fully functional. We cannot use it for payroll because it doesn't track and record tax payments and would require manual journal entries each time. I don't like that the timekeeping feature doesn't allow us to use biometrics (fingerprints via hardware device) when employees clock in and out of their shifts. Although it can integrate with several apps, these drawbacks keep me from recommending it as an HR solution.

Odoo has several functions that it offers to automate processes company-wide. I find the interface to be mostly user-friendly. There are some navigational difficulties when visiting one "app" and then returning to the dashboard, and their training videos could use some work. I find it about average as far as an ERP goes.

Identify exactly which processes you intend to utilize this service for and have a realistic implementation plan. If you're only using it for two or three processes, then a shorter training and implementation plan may work. If you have four or more processes you're looking to integrate, allow yourself and your team several months to meet with their implementation team and demo the trial software so that you can familiarize yourself with it before rolling it out to employees. Training is vital to understanding the full capabilities of the system.

They seem to have a lot of options for different processes that they say continually expand, such as inventory, appointments and to-do lists, project boards, discussion boards, manufacturing, shop floor, quality assurance, etc.

A mid to large-sized manufacturing facility that wants all employees using the same software to meet as many business needs as possible will find Odoo very useful.

• We can manage time and attendance records.
• We can manage onboarding and offboarding.
• We can manage the overall performance management of each employee.

Payroll, time and attendance, performance management, learning & development, recruitment -  all of these were pain points that led us to buy this tool. Prior to WebHR, we were using excel sheets / doing manual work. I have been using this tool for the last 4 years.

• Limited report tracking and analysis.
• Limited customization.
• Occasionally, the system can be slow to respond.

‍

The appealing quality of WebHR is that it can support the overall performance of each employee, both in small and large organizations.

From time to time, they roll out enhancements to their existing features.

There is no specific type of organization required to buy the WebHR. Any organization can buy this tool to enhance their overall performance and reduce manual work.