Best Payroll and Benefits Software Solutions in 2025

• I appreciated Deel for its user-friendly interface and straightforward usability.
• It was easy to navigate and intuitive, which made managing tasks efficient.
• The sales representative I interacted with was highly competent and responsive, which enhanced the overall experience of using the platform.

Replit bought Deel because of its global capacities, and I have used it for six months. It helped with the global side of payroll and compliance. It assisted in managing expenses when people onboarded, traveled, and took paid time off or leaves of absence. Other considerations included hiring contractors on their platform, which made it easier to hire people from different countries. This greatly diversified the workforce.

• I found Deel somewhat costly, and accessing the backend could be challenging if you weren't familiar with its setup.
• It takes time to get familiar with different systems.
• Keeping up with international laws was occasionally problematic and required multiple communications to align everyone. I appreciate that Deel is actively expanding its platform to address these issues.

Deel stands out due to its strong innovation and proactive market presence. Compared to Rippling, they were more responsive, which led me to believe that we should have onboarded everyone onto their platform. Deel's proactive approach to innovation kept them ahead in the market, offering solutions that were more responsive and tailored to our needs compared to Rippling. Their platform's capabilities and customer service exceeded expectations, making the transition smooth and efficient. Deel proved to be a valuable partner in streamlining operations and enhancing our business processes.

When considering Deel as an HR person, think about the specific needs of your organization, such as managing remote workers across different countries and ensuring compliance with international labor laws. Evaluate Deel's platform for its user-friendliness, scalability, and ability to handle payroll and contractor management efficiently. Consider the responsiveness and support provided by their customer service team, especially in resolving issues related to backend access and legal compliance. Assess Deel's pricing structure to ensure it aligns with your budget and provides value for the services offered.

Deel has continually adapted to meet users' evolving needs by enhancing its platform's functionality and user interface, making it more intuitive and user-friendly. They have expanded their global capabilities, allowing businesses to manage remote teams across diverse jurisdictions seamlessly. Deel's responsiveness to customer feedback has led to improvements in customer support and backend accessibility, ensuring smoother operations for HR professionals managing payroll and compliance tasks internationally. These advancements highlight Deel's commitment to evolving alongside the needs of modern businesses, facilitating efficient and compliant workforce management worldwide.

Deel is well-suited for small and medium-sized companies, offering capabilities that cater to their needs effectively. One standout feature is the ability to update people's compensation promptly, which proves beneficial for companies planning growth and scalability. This feature ensures that organizations can adapt quickly to changing circumstances and reward their workforce dynamically, fostering a supportive environment for ongoing expansion.

Its employee onboarding workflow is really smooth and user friendly for the recruiter. It helps in automating, creation and distribution of onboarding tasks and training materials.

I could regularly track completion of new hire paperwork, such as tax forms, I9 etc before their start date and coordinate with them if they haven't completed.

Another major advantage of paylocity is its payroll processing workflow. It calculates employee wages, deductions, and taxes based on pay rules and regulations and generates pay stubs. If an organization has a more hourly/contract based employees then this tool is apt for them.

Employees clock in and out through that system and then it integrates time and attendance data with payroll for accurate wage calculations.

When I joined, the organization was already using Paylocity as their HRIS system. I have used Paylocity for the entire tenure when I was working at Stars, around 5 months. Paylocity not only has ATS features but it also is a comprehensive HR and payroll management software. This was the main reason that the CEO of the company shifted from another tool to Paylocity as he wanted one tool which can manage Recruiting as well as Payroll.

In the organization, 90% of the employees are hourly employees. Paylocity helps manage employee attendance, track hours worked, and handle time-off requests. It offers various methods for clocking in/out, tracks leave balances, and integrates with payroll for accurate and efficient time tracking. This was the major key benefit of this tool.

Paylocity isn't quite user friendly, it has a lot of complex features. It makes it harder for people who are new to HRIS systems to adapt to Paylocity.

Its mobile app is also not at all user friendly, freezes when I want to clock in and out for the day. For a better experience it is always better to be on the desktop.

Its integration with different job boards and career sites isn't quite wide. It has limited reach and if you want to reach out to a wider pool of candidates by posting a job it charges extra money which is not cost effective.

Paylocity offers a comprehensive suite of HR and payroll management tools in a single platform. It combines various functionalities, including payroll processing, benefits administration, time and attendance tracking, performance management, and more. This integrated approach allows organizations to streamline their HR and payroll processes and reduce the need for multiple software solutions. As a recruiter, I would prefer another tool over Paylocity but from an organization's point of view, this is a good investment where HR and payroll management tool is in a single platform.

The organization's needs and priorities and ensure if it aligns with their HR and payroll requirements. Also, the cost is a major factor, if the organization isn't in need of payroll software then it's better to consider other options as Paylocity sometimes can be a little expensive. Paylocity offers Payroll Processing Workflow, Employee Onboarding Workflow, and Time and Attendance Workflow.

If the organization is specifically looking for these then Paylocity is a great investment. Also if the organization has more hourly/contract workers rather than full-time employees then Paylocity is a great tool.

No significant changes since I started using the tool.

Paylocity is a great tool for hourly/contract-based employees who has to daily punch in and punch out for their work hours. So it is mainly ideal for an organization that has nonexempt employees rather than exempt employees.

I really like that all the HR resources are essentially located in one place, especially with links embedded to external sites (eg. benefit provider). I also really like that I can access all my payroll info online in one place. The organizational chart feature is also really helpful for identifying the reporting structure for areas of the business I was less familiar with and help me connect with the appropriate team member on cross-functional projects.

We bought ADP to cut back on internal payroll costs, provide employees with online access to their payroll info, avoid manually mailing out paper T4's every year, consolidate HR information and links into 1 platform, streamline data entry requirements for the payroll team, help move employee calls and inquiries to the ADP team, free up internal payroll/HR time, and streamline HR recruiting and tracking request. I have been personally using it for around 2 years now I believe.

The login process always feels very cumbersome with the multiple authentication steps and 2FA. The performance review functionality was extremely tedious - there were a lot of different screens and it wasn't easy to locate reviews or edit them - it just seemed much more complicated than it needed to be and a lot of my managers struggled to complete their reviews even with instruction manuals. I also wish there was a way to inquire about any payroll discrepancies directly - employees would have to email me (with no visibility as a District Manager) and I would have to forward payroll and it always seemed to slow down the efficiency, especially when the answer was something simple.

More functionality and works as a total company website as opposed to just a payroll viewing platform. Much more visually appealing and easy to navigate than some other platforms (like some SAP ones I've seen)

How much functionality you want out of the platform - just access to paystubs or a fully integrated HR platform. Customization options - for example we could add custom fields like t-shirt size for team events and/or self-declaration options (eg. covid vaccination status)

We're still relatively new to the platform, so it's hard to say what is an ADP change or just an organizational learning, but I have seen the addition of new self-declaration fields in the employee profile. The benefits section and external links continue to expand as well. We struggled with the performance review section, but I believe this is now being worked on in the backend by our L&D team.

For a large organization looking to streamline HR / payroll operations, particularly if trying to move away from paper-based payroll/pay stubs.

• Easy Onboarding - Remote does make onboarding hires in remote locations quite easy.
• Online Portal - great to have all the hires from all international locations in one place.
• Expenses - easy for employees and companies to track/pay expenses.

With a shortage of talent in the U.S., our firm needed to hire in locations where we did not have an entity. Global EORs offer a way to do that without setting up a legal entity first. Remote was an up-and-coming player in the space that made getting setup much faster, less complex than traditional partners like Velocity Global. We have used the system for approximately 2 years now.

• Billing/Invoicing - Remote has had multiple billing errors in our invoices and their system is incredibly confusing for reconciling what is outstanding vs. the errors they have made.
• Management - Remote has changed management recently and they have changed terms & conditions from our original invoices and have taken away promotions by saying they were "introductory promotions" rather than the "negotiated terms" like we originally discussed.

Remote was a leader in simplicity when we first began using their services a couple of years ago. Now, I believe certain competitors have caught up and surpassed them.

• Cash flow - these services require upfront payment for payroll so be prepared to pay month end payroll by the 17th of that month.
• Terminating employees - Employment laws vary country by country. Remote is offering a service to make it easier on your company to hire elsewhere; however, terminating employees can be quite difficult.

Remote was very startup friendly 2 years ago. Their management has changed and their culture has changed drastically. It is no longer a customer-focused culture going above and beyond to win customers.

Remote is good for an established company in search of a way to explore hiring people in other regions of the world.

Paycor had a simple interface that was easy to navigate. We were pleased with its all-in-one HRIS solution, which replaced multiple separate systems we had previously integrated. It was a cost-effective solution for a business of our size.

We used Paycor at a previous organization I worked for. We selected it over competitors because we felt it was the best fit for the size of our organization (about 200 employees). The main reason we chose it was to use it as an all-in-one solution for HRIS. We used it for approximately four years.

Customer service at Paycor left a lot to be desired after implementation. There were extra fees for special requests that were not explained upfront. Annual renewals became more expensive over the years.

It is a cost-effective solution compared to many competitors. Reports are customizable and easy to generate. With some other HRIS tools, report generation was more difficult. Since implementation, customer service has been lacking.

Other HRIS providers tend to emphasize customer service and client partnerships more. Paycor met our needs at the time, but more robust systems would better serve larger organizations.

There are a few key factors to consider when purchasing an HRIS/payroll tool. One is customer service and how well the provider supports your organization after the sale. This is especially important for small organizations that rely on strong customer support to save time.

Cost is another factor, but pricing may vary depending on the organization's size, with some providers offering significant discounts for larger businesses.

Organizations should also clarify their specific needs by creating lists of "must-haves," "nice-to-haves," and "not needed" features. This helps avoid paying for unnecessary functionality and can serve as a bargaining tool during negotiations.

During the time I used it, I observed that they kept up to date with wage and labor laws by state, which was crucial for compliance. Over the four years I used it, they implemented software updates to ensure the system functioned smoothly. Although we did not use this feature, they added integration capabilities with other tools over time.

Paycor is well-suited for mid-sized businesses that have HR experts on staff and need an easy-to-use tool.

The software is laid out very nicely, making it easy to find anything, and all employee documents are in one place. Reports are easy to find and customize. Their help desk is extremely knowledgeable. If they can't help you, it's elevated via a ticket system to an in-house engineer. Gusto is so user-friendly that an employee can learn what they need to know in minutes.

Gusto was purchased for a small company's payroll, HR management, and processes.

We needed to simplify payroll, become fully HR compliant, and organize processes (handbook, reviews, job descriptions, tax documentation, etc. for the team). HR at the time had worked with various large platforms that would not suit our needs because they were overly complicated with a cumbersome setup for a small company.

Combined with features we would never use, these platforms were an unworkable option. This led us to find a vendor specific to small businesses. A colleague of the owner suggested Gusto. After one demonstration, we decided to go with the full suite of offerings (Premium) but later reduced to Plus. Once you learn the features, you know what you can do without and save some money.

One problem we had, which Gusto was unable to solve at the time, was timekeeping. We added a timekeeping system that partners with Gusto for a seamless hourly staff payroll. There are lots of options listed within Gusto.

I've used the Gusto tool for four years. All our HR problems were solved. Gusto works perfectly for a small business (under 100 employees). Payroll is a snap. Managers approve their employees' time, it's filtered into the Gusto system, and ready for final approval/submission within minutes.

Additionally, you have a window to pull back payroll to make changes. All adjustments (healthcare, court-ordered payments, etc.) are easily set up via each employee, and changes can be made within seconds. Employees can update their personal or tax information right in their app, which is very convenient for them.

Gusto simplified the entire onboarding process, along with payroll, handbooks, employee reviews, etc. Gusto needs to add their own time clock system (if they haven't already), but their time clock partners work extremely well.

One last point, if you want to be very specific about which employee's information their manager is allowed to see, Gusto has levels of permissions for managers and employees built into the software.

It would be nice if they had a timekeeping system (that wasn't on the internet), reducing the need for another app. It would also be nice if Gusto had an applicant tracking system. PTO can be cumbersome to figure out on an accrual basis.

Gusto is by far the best payroll, HRIS software I've used mainly due to its simplicity and speed.

How many employees do you plan on running through the system? Payroll over 100 could be run better on a different platform. Understand what Gusto cannot do that you'll need to add on (timekeeping app, harassment training). What does your accounting firm do for you that Gusto can automate? 940/941 filings, tax setup for unemployment in each state.

I'm a fan of their customer service; however, many think they're too slow. Growing pains, Gusto's management will catch up. They've streamlined even more in the last four years.

The entire HR department and all managers with staff in small business can find Gusto to be a great fit.

Ease of setting up and configuring automation during the onboarding process allowed for key touchpoints to be made during an integral stage of employment. Rippling also served as a single sign-on for the Google suite products our organization used. We received multiple compliments from employees on how easy the system was to use from their perspective.

My organization wanted to move away from an HRIS that was not cost-effective. After vetting multiple HRIS options, we decided to go with Rippling. The relationship with the sales and implementation team was seamless. Rippling offered a fully integrated payroll and HRIS system at an affordable cost. My organization used Rippling during the final year we were in business and should have made the switch sooner.

There were extra fees related to year-end tax filings, such as ACA and 1095 forms. The reporting function had some limitations; while several report templates were already built in, much of the data we needed required creating custom reports. Not all of the "fun" areas of the system were included in the core package. We could have done a lot more with Rippling but simply did not have the budget to add on the additional functions.

It felt very modern from both an Administrator standpoint and an employee perspective. It did not feel like an outdated system like some others, which was something that stood out to my organization, especially being in the SaaS space.

I suggest identifying which HRIS features are most important for your organization. Some may prioritize a robust reporting function, while others may need compliant payroll across multiple states. Once those key features are identified, avoid compromising if possible. Also, consider the Administrator who will be heavily involved in the system each day—what tools do they need to succeed, how can this system help streamline their current processes, and how can it improve overall efficiency?

Unfortunately, I do not have enough experience with this system to accurately answer this question, as my organization was only with Rippling for 12 months.

Small to medium-sized businesses looking for a modern approach to HRIS and payroll. An ideal user would be someone who wants to embrace technology and utilize it in standard processes.

We are a small non-profit, and they provide us with a non-profit discount. It has all the functionality we need without being overly complicated. Processing payroll is quick and easy.

We bought OnPay because it seemed to be the best fit for our organization. It has all the functionality we need to handle HR and payroll for our small group of employees. It is robust enough to meet our needs but not overly complicated like some of the larger systems. It is easy to use, yet it allows us to process multi-state payroll and manage our employees' time off. It also includes all the basic reporting that we require.

It doesn't offer much in terms of custom reporting. Much of the HR information requires navigating to individual employee records to view. You can't edit a benefit plan once it's created; you have to make a new one to implement any changes.

OnPay is really the only system of its type and size that I've used, so I can't say how it compares to competitors. It is much simpler than ADP or UKG, which I have used, but we are getting it for a fraction of the cost. The simplicity of the system actually works well for our team.

Consider the needs of your business and team. OnPay is a fairly basic HR and payroll system. It covers all the essentials, but if you need extensive reporting or numerous integrations with other systems, you might want to explore a higher-tier HR/payroll solution. Additionally, consider cost. Even without the non-profit discount, it's a very economical solution compared to some of the larger providers.

I haven't noticed any significant changes since we started using OnPay, but as I mentioned, it already meets our needs.

I believe OnPay is great for smaller companies that don't need extensive features in their HR and payroll system.

It is easy to use - the interface is intuitive. I like the app and the fact I can do receipt tracking on my phone. I like that I can easily give my employees a company card and have them forward receipts into Quickbooks.

We work with a CPA firm who helped us to integrate Quickbooks across our organization. We began using Quickbooks in 2018, when our firm had just under $60,000 in revenue a year. Today, we use Quickbooks to manage the company's $1.7M and growing annual budget. We used Quickbooks because we wanted to have accurate timely financial statements across the organization, track all of our expenses, and manage our businesses PnL easily. I've been the primary user for the past 5 years.

I wish that it had better cash flow capabilities - the current capabilities do not account for projections. I also wish that when adding users there was an option to add employees who just had employee cards who need to email receipts into Quickbooks instead of having to take up a user seat - right now we have some employees emailing receipts to a company user to forward them on because there is only five seats in our plan. I also wish Quickbooks integrated better with my bank - the bank connection is always breaking and needs to be updated.

I haven't used similar tools - before Quickbooks I did everything on a spreadsheet. I did choose Quickbooks because it came highly recommended from my CPA firm.

People should think about their needs for financial reporting. People should also think about their needs for billing, and tracking employee expenses.

It works great for my consulting firm!

It is able to handle centralized payroll for multiple entities, affordable compared to some competitor options, has views for both managers and employee self-service, and allows employees to review and ‘approve’ their paychecks in advance.

We have worked with Paycom for about 5 years. We had outgrown BambooHR (at least at the time, they didn't have integrated payroll) and then had a really bad experience with BeyondPay. We needed a combined HR/payroll system that could accommodate multi-state as well as multiple legal entities (we have affiliates managed by central HR/acct). Paycom was the most affordable option that could accommodate our needs at the time.

• The reporting functions aren't great: the filtering options rarely work as they are supposed to so we often do a workaround where we run a huge report file and then use XLS filters to get the data we need as opposed to producing a report from the system that is what you need from the start.
• Limited customization options: we have many things we’d like to track and there is cap on the number of custom fields that can be added.
• The clock in/out functionality is clunky: it works fine if people all work under one company code/work type. If you need to assign hours to different projects (say you want to track learning hours, or you have funding partners and you need to track hours on their grant) it’s very cumbersome for hourly employees.

How much customization do you need” is an important thing to consider and also whether you need data sync between other platforms. If so, Paycom may not be the best fit for you.

Honestly don't feel like they've evolved much in the time we've used them.

Small, fairly simple organizations

• We have access to an in-country partner in Germany who speaks the local language, which helps with communication and local compliance.
• They are knowledgeable about specific regulations, helping us stay compliant with payroll laws.
• Paychex facilitates ancillary payments such as taxes and health insurance, reducing some administrative burden on our team.

Our organization needed a local payroll solution to stay compliant with regulations, and Paychex offered a competitive price. We have been using it for six years, but it has not always met our expectations.

While it handles basic payroll functions, we have encountered issues with customer support and system limitations. The platform can be inefficient at times, requiring more manual intervention than expected. Although it has helped us manage payroll, we are not entirely satisfied with the overall experience.

• It is difficult to get in touch with a representative, especially if they are not based in-country.
• The representatives often do not speak English or use a translator, which has been a challenge—something we haven’t encountered with other providers in 20+ countries.
• The platform lacks flexibility and often requires manual workarounds for tasks that should be automated.

• The tools are quite similar—Paychex offers a basic platform with standard payroll processing and reporting features.
• Its reporting capabilities are not particularly advanced, and more robust reports or analytical tools would improve the payroll review process.
• The response rate from representatives is comparable to other providers, but the lack of language support makes communication more difficult.
• Overall, it does not stand out significantly from competitors in terms of functionality or service.

• When choosing a payroll provider, consider whether having a local contact who speaks the in-country language is essential for your team.
• Decide if you prefer to process payroll in-house or rely on an external vendor, as this affects the level of control and oversight needed.
• If your internal team lacks the bandwidth to manage payroll, outsourcing to a provider like Paychex can be helpful, but it’s important to stay involved to ensure accuracy.
• Evaluate the reporting and compliance support offered, as robust tools can simplify payroll reviews and audits.
• Customer support responsiveness is another critical factor, especially if you operate across time zones or require multilingual assistance.

Paychex has made incremental updates to its user-facing portals to improve accessibility and functionality.

They continue to invest in their technology, but the platform remains relatively basic compared to more advanced systems like Workday or UKG Pro.

Some improvements have been made, such as modernized interfaces and slight enhancements in automation, but the tool still lacks the robust reporting and analytics many users need.

Overall, while the tool has evolved, it has not significantly differentiated itself from competitors in terms of innovation or functionality.

• Paychex is well-suited for small businesses (50 employees or fewer) that need payroll support but lack in-house expertise on local compliance and tax regulations.
• It is especially beneficial for organizations expanding into new countries that require a local payroll partner to handle filings and payments.
• Companies with limited HR and payroll resources may find it useful, as it helps offload some administrative tasks.
• Larger organizations or those needing more advanced reporting and automation may find it lacking.

Ease of use. Subject matter expert for international payroll. Takes away the liability of mishandling payroll due to lack of knowledge.

We started working with Papaya Global because we needed a way to pay our employees located in Peru. We are currently with a PEO and they do not cover international payroll. We have been using them for a year now.

I cannot think of anything the company could use to improve at this time.

Their pricing is more competitive than the competition.

Ease of use, knowledge base, global reach in case you need to expand to other areas, pricing.

Any organization could use their services if they have a need to handle payroll internationally and do not have internal resources that can facilitate the process.

I like the aesthetic of the site; it is fun to use and user-friendly. The mobile version is functional during onboarding, unlike many other systems that claim to be mobile-friendly; Namely actually is! I like how things flow and the ease of uploading and storing documents. I like that our people enjoy using Namely.

We selected Namely because we wanted a personalized solution fit for our unique needs. We were tired of the same old runaround with big companies like ADP and being passed from one department to another to solve a simple issue. My company needed a better user experience for us as administrators and for our employees. Our primary pain point was transitioning off of a full-service PEO and needing a personalized touch and a good bit of handholding during setup. I used Namely for one year, and the company I was with is still using the product.

During the merger with Prism, there were some system bugs, but those seemed to get sorted out after a month or so. At times, the chat or help function can be slow to use, and I had to restart a few chats, which did not make me happy at that time. That said, the Namely reps were always courteous and went above and beyond to help us. Since we had no appointed contact team, I was always talking to a new person, which can be challenging when working through a long-term project like multi-state payroll tax setup or complex benefits.

I like that Namely allows the HR team to drive the bus. If someone is not tech-savvy, Namely will not be the best tool for them. Namely stacks up against its competitors well, and I loved using the system! I’d use it again.

Before investing in this platform, determine if your HR team is at least moderately tech-savvy; if not, look elsewhere. Do you have under 500 employees? If yes, Namely can easily accommodate your group. Do you have at least one HR person on staff per 75-100 employees? If not, you should consider adding an admin. Namely is a great tool, but it doesn’t think for you. People still need to do the work, especially benefits and payroll-related tasks.

Yes, it has, and they are doing a good job adjusting to market needs. Namely is cutting-edge and definitely improving over time.

Namely is a great tool for small to mid-sized businesses.