Best HR and Payroll Software Systems in 2026

I like that it’s easy to use. Payroll is seamless and easy to submit. New hires are tracked well, and they integrate with payroll once hired. I also appreciate the training features and how easy it is to assign trainings to new hires and track current employees’ progress. It helps us stay compliant.

We decided to use Paylocity to run payroll after moving away from a PEO and bringing everything in-house. We needed a payroll system, and this one integrated easily within our company. We used it for payroll, performance tracking, and time-off tracking. It streamlined our operations, and we’ve been using it for these tasks.

One downside is their customer service, which takes longer to respond. Onboarding all the information at the beginning was somewhat confusing and took a while. Lastly, making changes to payroll sometimes required a lengthy process to resolve.

Paylocity excels in integrating with other systems. For example, they have DocuSign embedded in their platform, making it easy to send offer letters and employee agreements securely, which are then automatically loaded into the employee file. This seamless integration sets them apart from competitors.

Consider the number of employees you have. This system is great for smaller companies, but larger ones with over a few thousand employees might need a different payroll system. Also, consider which features you need. Do you want recruitment and training features, or are you focused solely on payroll? They offer a la carte options, but each comes with associated fees.

Paylocity has evolved by integrating with more systems, allowing for seamless workflows. As mentioned, they’ve embedded DocuSign, making document management more efficient. Over time, they’ve added features like training modules, expanding their library of available trainings to meet user needs.

Paylocity is great for smaller companies, probably under 2,000 employees. It’s ideal for organizations that value organized, easy-to-use systems. The platform’s efficiency and ease of navigation are definite perks.

I like that our data sits in one place - makes it easier to find. I especially like the link to e-verify, that brings me peace of mind. I also enjoy the way the user experience is set up for the pay profile.

I was not a part of the organization when they decided to begin using ADP. My understanding is, we were using a PEO, and decided to move in-house utilizing the ADP tool. It's been great for payroll and for onboarding employees. I have used it for 2.5 years at this organization within HR, and as a user at other companies. ADP has been great for managing benefits, employee pay statements, etc. It is nice to have a system that employees can self-serve.

I am not sure if I am unaware or if we just haven't done this, but I wish ADP linked to our HRIS. It has been difficult to enter manual data and an integration would be helpful. Sometimes, I also feel like the user experience as a whole is a bit wonky. It is not always the most intuitive tool to use.

I have not really used other competitors, so I can't speak to this question.

Consider integrations with your HRIS and how that would work - how manual would your processes be? Ask yourself how open enrollment could benefit from this tool. Additionally, consider how employees would find the user experience. Consider which options you will utilize and how you will communicate about them. Also, talk to ADP about what their customer service setup will look like for your organization, what will the level of support be?

The e-verify feature has been a big one. It’s been great to have that functionality for our business.

I'd say a mid to large but imagine it is good for smaller organizations, too. Large-size organizations can benefit from having data in one place.

One pro of Deel is that it’s always very easy to get in touch with support.

We have used Deel for at least a few years. I have personally used Deel for just over one year. The pain point we were trying to solve was implementing a seamless payroll process for our international team.

We have also used Deel as an EOR for our international employees. We initially started using Deel specifically for our international team, and it worked really well for those employees.

The key benefit it provides is simple payroll processing, regardless of where the person resides. The site is easy to use and navigate. Another benefit is the responsiveness of the support team.

One con of Deel is the offboarding process and its unclear procedures. I wish they would improve this part. Another con is that support often passes you between multiple people, none of whom have prior context, which leads to repeating the same information.

Deel is fine, but I think their competitors are better. I prefer every other payroll platform I have used over Deel.

One criterion to consider before using Deel is what your team structure looks like. Deel is helpful because employees or contractors can be onboarded regardless of location. I found that, for us, it made the most sense to use Deel specifically for our international team.

I can’t think of any specific changes that have been made in the one-plus year I’ve used Deel.

I can’t think of any specific changes that have been made in the one-plus year I’ve used Deel.

• Bob was a fun and engaging HRIS that employees really enjoyed.
• It allowed a lot of interaction within the platform, and for people to get to know each other better.
• There was a surprising amount of customizability you could get from the system.

I used HiBob HRIS between 2019-2020. We unfortunately had to move off of BambooHR, and HiBob was the next best platform for our company of 250+ employees. During my time, we'd used it for about 1 year. It's a very people and engagement oriented HRIS that encourages a lot of opportunities to celebrate each other, interact around any announcements, and is very culture focused. The key benefit it provided was a culturally engaging HRIS that employees enjoyed using once they were trained on it.

• It had a lot of bugs and the server can be slow at times. Hopefully this issue has resolved over time.
• It's not an all-in-one platform, they encourage you to partner with other best in class payroll, time keeping, etc. systems.
• The UI looked great, but the UX was a bit clunky. For almost all processes, there was a lot of click through that had to be made and the experience was not very user friendly.

Bob excels at creating a people first and culture centric HRIS which most do not do. At most it's where you check for your payroll. However, we got a lot of great positive feedback around the platform itself. Around HR Processes though, they seemed to still be growing in functionality at the time (2019). They are integrated with a lot of the major brands / companies around payroll, timekeeping, etc. so it makes it easy to use across platforms.

• All-In-One Platform: If you're looking for an all in one platform, this won't be the best fit. However, if you're looking for a good culturally engaging HRIS this would be a good option!
• Onboarding -> Payroll -> Offboarding Workflow: It's important to think about where you're starting your employment/ onboarding workflow since it's not an all in one system. To avoid double work / entry, it's very important to map out where you want to include what data and how you can transfer that across platforms.

Bob was very hands-on and interactive throughout the implementation, training process. They've got an aggressive and extensive roadmap which is exciting. They receive feedback very well, and it was exciting to grow alongside the company and system because we did see things change rapidly within the system for the better.

I think Bob is best for <500 employee companies. It would also probably be better for companies who have a majority of salaried employees vs. hourly non-exempt. And also for a company that wants to use the best in class platforms for various parts of the people experience.

The user interface is impressive and appeals to both employees and administrators. The payroll tool is quick and easy to use. The chat support feature is highly effective—whenever I need help, I can get assistance almost immediately.

We began using Rippling as our first HRIS tool for our small company. As with many small businesses, HRIS tools were not initially a priority, so we wanted something simple, straightforward, and intuitive. Rippling met all of those requirements.

It offers an efficient user interface while also providing depth and ease of use from the administrator side. It made payroll very simple for us. Rippling is still in use at our company today.

The cost can be challenging for a small business; we experienced some initial sticker shock, though the features are worth it. It can be difficult to use custom fields within reporting. The contract length is somewhat unusual and feels like a significant commitment.

Many payroll companies have unattractive user interfaces, which can discourage employees from logging in to complete tasks such as benefits enrollment or onboarding. Rippling integrates well with Slack and Google Workspace, simplifying communication across departments. I prefer Rippling over most other tools I have used.

The key buying criteria should begin with your budget and what you're willing to invest. It's important to understand what features are standard and which are considered add-ons, as these can significantly increase costs.

Based on your needs, it’s also worth evaluating how benefits are handled and whether the platform simplifies that process. Integration is another factor to consider—look into what systems the HRIS can connect with and how those integrations improve efficiency.

During the time I’ve used Rippling, there haven’t been many major changes to the tool itself. This reflects how robust the system has been from the start. Minor enhancements do occur from time to time.

My experience with Rippling has been at a small company (under 50 employees), and it has made my work significantly easier. I believe it would be a great tool for organizations of any size.

The software is laid out very nicely, making it easy to find anything, and all employee documents are in one place. Reports are easy to find and customize. Their help desk is extremely knowledgeable. If they can't help you, it's elevated via a ticket system to an in-house engineer. Gusto is so user-friendly that an employee can learn what they need to know in minutes.

Gusto was purchased for a small company's payroll, HR management, and processes.

We needed to simplify payroll, become fully HR compliant, and organize processes (handbook, reviews, job descriptions, tax documentation, etc. for the team). HR at the time had worked with various large platforms that would not suit our needs because they were overly complicated with a cumbersome setup for a small company.

Combined with features we would never use, these platforms were an unworkable option. This led us to find a vendor specific to small businesses. A colleague of the owner suggested Gusto. After one demonstration, we decided to go with the full suite of offerings (Premium) but later reduced to Plus. Once you learn the features, you know what you can do without and save some money.

One problem we had, which Gusto was unable to solve at the time, was timekeeping. We added a timekeeping system that partners with Gusto for a seamless hourly staff payroll. There are lots of options listed within Gusto.

I've used the Gusto tool for four years. All our HR problems were solved. Gusto works perfectly for a small business (under 100 employees). Payroll is a snap. Managers approve their employees' time, it's filtered into the Gusto system, and ready for final approval/submission within minutes.

Additionally, you have a window to pull back payroll to make changes. All adjustments (healthcare, court-ordered payments, etc.) are easily set up via each employee, and changes can be made within seconds. Employees can update their personal or tax information right in their app, which is very convenient for them.

Gusto simplified the entire onboarding process, along with payroll, handbooks, employee reviews, etc. Gusto needs to add their own time clock system (if they haven't already), but their time clock partners work extremely well.

One last point, if you want to be very specific about which employee's information their manager is allowed to see, Gusto has levels of permissions for managers and employees built into the software.

It would be nice if they had a timekeeping system (that wasn't on the internet), reducing the need for another app. It would also be nice if Gusto had an applicant tracking system. PTO can be cumbersome to figure out on an accrual basis.

Gusto is by far the best payroll, HRIS software I've used mainly due to its simplicity and speed.

How many employees do you plan on running through the system? Payroll over 100 could be run better on a different platform. Understand what Gusto cannot do that you'll need to add on (timekeeping app, harassment training). What does your accounting firm do for you that Gusto can automate? 940/941 filings, tax setup for unemployment in each state.

I'm a fan of their customer service; however, many think they're too slow. Growing pains, Gusto's management will catch up. They've streamlined even more in the last four years.

The entire HR department and all managers with staff in small business can find Gusto to be a great fit.

Pro one: The system is easy to use and learn. Pro two: It can grow with your organization and accommodate a range of different employer sizes. Pro three: It has mobile functionality, allowing employees and administrators to access leave requests or review documents via a mobile app.

The organization already had PlanSource, which was owned by UKG. We expanded the use of the product since it already housed our HRIS and payroll information. It is fairly inexpensive with many add-on options, making it a good option for growth, which the company was experiencing. At that time, we had approximately 300 employees with plans to grow to 500.

Con one: UKG is fairly basic compared to other products I've used (ADP, Paychex, Workday). There are no big bells and whistles, but it gets the job done. Con two: You will have to pay a significant amount for full functionalities of the products if needed. I don't have cons other than these.

UKG offers a wide range of products, making it a good option for growing employers that don't have a lot of needs initially but will as they grow. Their backend helpdesk is also helpful because you can contact a person on many issues versus submitting a request/ticket for assistance and waiting for a response.

Consider your initial needs and your growth potential. If you have fewer than 100 employees, you can find other services that are more economical. If you plan to grow to a few hundred employees and beyond, this is a good long-term investment.

They are continually expanding their options. As previously mentioned, they have nice app capabilities. They also, like any other HRIS service, are continually adding or enhancing their offerings, such as benefits services, carrier feed setups, and reporting options.

UKG is a good fit for any private sector employer with 100 or more employees. I would not recommend it to employers smaller than this unless they will grow quickly beyond this number.

Namely has an extremely user-friendly interface that helps manage HR tasks efficiently. It integrates payroll, benefits, and performance management into one platform, simplifying key processes. The tool offers customizable reporting capabilities that provide insightful personnel data while maintaining compliance with regulations.

Namely, an automated HR solution preferred by our management after a long history of inefficient HR processes, has proven its relevance as all operations have been streamlined. Switching and gathering information from different platforms was difficult, especially when accustomed to one system's workflow.

Before introducing Namely, completing payroll, personnel records, and other internal processes was time-consuming and prone to errors. We aimed to implement automation to allow a focus on tasks like performance management rather than correcting discrepancies. Namely’s user-friendly interface, creative report design, and working tools played a crucial role in its successful implementation.

I have been using Namely for [insert your time of use], and it has made our human resource processes more efficient, improving workforce management. It has also eliminated the problem of waiting for reports, a common issue in many companies that wastes valuable time.

Customer support at Namely is slow, especially when handling urgent issues. Some customization options, like those for reports, are limited and should be more flexible. Occasional system glitches or downtimes can disrupt important HR workflows and reduce productivity.

Namely's key differentiator is its all-in-one platform, featuring an intuitive user interface that combines payroll, benefits, and performance management in one system. This reduces the need for multiple tools. Compared to platforms like ADP or Workday, Namely is much easier for non-technical users. While competitors may offer more in-depth functionality in specific areas, Namely strikes the best balance between features and simplicity, making it ideal for midsize companies seeking a full-service solution.

When investing in an HR tool like Namely, key considerations include scalability—ensuring the platform can grow with your company—and integration capabilities with other systems such as payroll and benefits providers. Ease of use is critical, as a user-friendly interface leads to higher adoption and minimal training. Additionally, it's important to assess the level of customer support provided and how responsive the vendor is when issues arise. Customization options are another important factor, as the platform’s ability to adapt to your specific HR needs can significantly impact day-to-day operations.

Namely has evolved significantly over time, enhancing its platform to meet user demands with better integration features. Originally focused on core HR management, it has expanded to include payroll management, benefits administration, and compliance tools that help companies align with regulations.

The user experience has improved with a more intuitive interface, and customizable reporting has become more robust to extract meaningful data. Namely has also responded to customer feedback by improving its customer support and onboarding processes, addressing concerns about response times and implementation smoothness.

Namely is ideal for mid-sized organizations, typically with 50 to 500 employees, that want a user-friendly HR solution covering all key HR functions. It is especially suited for companies seeking an easy way to manage payroll, benefits, and performance management without the complexities of large enterprise systems.

Namely also works well for organizations that value employee engagement and want to use data-driven insights to improve HR practices continuously. Its intuitive design makes it accessible for HR teams with any level of technical expertise.

Pros:

- The information you can get access to is extremely helpful

- The UI/UX is very clean

- All-in-one type solution

Workday was selected because it offered a comprehensive people solution. Instead of having different portals for compensation, performance management, recruiting, and people analytics, Workday allowed everything to live in one system of record. This reduced costs and ramp time in some ways because it allowed everyone to be in one place.

I've used it for a combined 2-2.5 years in my career in all facets from selection to design and then every day use for reporting and recruiting.

Cons:

- The Recruiting module for recruiters and recruiting coordinators is not intuitive and user friendly

- The Recruiting module for candidates is lengthy and miserable. It does a terrible job of parsing resumes

- Job management versus position management makes data funky in some instances (for example, if you were hired into a position, it can look like you hired your whole team unless you put in specific calculated fields)

- If you don't have the right access controls, it is borderline impossible to do your job effectively.

The Workday Recruiting Module (their ATS) is one of the most reviled in the Recruiting space. It doesn't compare well to other ATS like Greenhouse, Lever, or Ashby because the latter offers better functionality, controls, and ease of use.

- Ease of use. Workday has the ability to be so much but you have to know exactly what to look for and how to configure it.

- Implementation time. Workday requires a focused implementation and testing period. Without it, you will run into a number of problems. If you need to roll out something quickly, Workday isn't the tool for you.

It is difficult to tell because they release big updates every 6 months so requests for solutions might be forgotten by that point.

HR Business Partners, HR Operations, Finance, Compensation, and C-Suite

• BambooHR is very user-friendly and easy for both HR and employees to navigate.
• The onboarding workflows save a lot of time by automating tasks and paperwork for new hires.
• The reporting features make it simple to generate useful data and track HR metrics.
• Employee self-service tools allow staff to update their own information, reducing HR administrative work.

My organization chose BambooHR because we needed a more streamlined way to manage employee records, onboarding, and performance tracking. Before implementing it, our HR processes were very time-consuming, which made it hard to keep data accurate and accessible.

BambooHR solved that by giving us a central system where employees and managers could easily find what they needed. I have personally used it for about two years, and during that time I found it especially helpful for automating onboarding workflows and keeping employee information organized.

Overall, it made day-to-day HR administration much smoother and saved our team a lot of time.

• Reporting is useful but can feel limited when trying to build more complex reports; adding more customization and advanced filters would make the tool more powerful.
• The payroll integration is not as seamless as dedicated payroll platforms; it would be more efficient if it offered stronger built-in payroll functionality.
• Customer support response times can be inconsistent, especially during peak seasons; a real-time chat feature would help resolve issues more quickly.

BambooHR stands out from many competitors because of its clean, intuitive interface that makes it easy for both HR teams and employees to use. Compared to other systems I've used, it requires less training and onboarding, which improves adoption across the company.

It also offers strong onboarding workflows and employee self-service features that some competitors don't emphasize as much.

When buying an HR tool like BambooHR, the first thing to consider is ease of use for both HR teams and employees, since adoption depends heavily on user experience. It's also important to look at how well the system integrates with payroll, benefits, and other platforms you already use.

Make sure the tool can grow with your organization rather than needing to be replaced after a few years.

BambooHR has evolved by expanding beyond core HR functions like employee records and onboarding to include more features such as performance management, time tracking, and payroll.

Over time, they have also improved the user interface and added more automation to simplify day-to-day tasks for both HR and employees.

BambooHR is well-suited for small to mid-sized organizations that need an all-in-one HR platform without the complexity of larger enterprise systems.

We are a small non-profit, and they provide us with a non-profit discount. It has all the functionality we need without being overly complicated. Processing payroll is quick and easy.

We bought OnPay because it seemed to be the best fit for our organization. It has all the functionality we need to handle HR and payroll for our small group of employees. It is robust enough to meet our needs but not overly complicated like some of the larger systems. It is easy to use, yet it allows us to process multi-state payroll and manage our employees' time off. It also includes all the basic reporting that we require.

It doesn't offer much in terms of custom reporting. Much of the HR information requires navigating to individual employee records to view. You can't edit a benefit plan once it's created; you have to make a new one to implement any changes.

OnPay is really the only system of its type and size that I've used, so I can't say how it compares to competitors. It is much simpler than ADP or UKG, which I have used, but we are getting it for a fraction of the cost. The simplicity of the system actually works well for our team.

Consider the needs of your business and team. OnPay is a fairly basic HR and payroll system. It covers all the essentials, but if you need extensive reporting or numerous integrations with other systems, you might want to explore a higher-tier HR/payroll solution. Additionally, consider cost. Even without the non-profit discount, it's a very economical solution compared to some of the larger providers.

I haven't noticed any significant changes since we started using OnPay, but as I mentioned, it already meets our needs.

I believe OnPay is great for smaller companies that don't need extensive features in their HR and payroll system.

It’s easy to use. It offers multiple features at a reasonable cost for a company of our size. The onboarding process is efficient and streamlined.

Our company was starting to grow and needed more Human Resources (HR) management tools. We were using another HR and payroll software but had outgrown its features. After researching functionality, pricing, and ease of use, we chose Paycor.

This platform offers everything: HR and payroll software, talent acquisition, talent management, and workforce management to support each function. This is especially helpful for our one-person HR team.

The platform forces guided tours for explanations, which can be time-consuming. You have to speak with the sales team to get answers to specific questions. Product and pricing details are not clearly laid out online, requiring unnecessary effort to locate them.

The most important differentiator, in my opinion, is the cost and the functionality offered by this platform—especially in the areas of talent acquisition, workforce management, and payroll. I haven’t found other platforms to be as user-friendly at this price point with comparable features.

Consider your company’s size and identify work processes that can be automated or need to be streamlined. Think about the number of employees you have—how are you recruiting, managing compliance, and handling documentation?

For a company with 50–100 employees, this platform is a strong fit due to features like workforce management and talent acquisition. Even for companies with 1–50 employees, the payroll functionality alone is beneficial.

It has added more features and now has a more robust and knowledgeable sales team.

This tool is ideal for companies with 50–100 employees. It helps maintain compliance, automates processes to save time, and compiles reports and reminders. It functions like an assistant to the HR department and provides employees with easy access to their schedules and time-off requests.