Best HR and Payroll Software Systems in 2025

Its employee onboarding workflow is really smooth and user friendly for the recruiter. It helps in automating, creation and distribution of onboarding tasks and training materials.

I could regularly track completion of new hire paperwork, such as tax forms, I9 etc before their start date and coordinate with them if they haven't completed.

Another major advantage of paylocity is its payroll processing workflow. It calculates employee wages, deductions, and taxes based on pay rules and regulations and generates pay stubs. If an organization has a more hourly/contract based employees then this tool is apt for them.

Employees clock in and out through that system and then it integrates time and attendance data with payroll for accurate wage calculations.

When I joined, the organization was already using Paylocity as their HRIS system. I have used Paylocity for the entire tenure when I was working at Stars, around 5 months. Paylocity not only has ATS features but it also is a comprehensive HR and payroll management software. This was the main reason that the CEO of the company shifted from another tool to Paylocity as he wanted one tool which can manage Recruiting as well as Payroll.

In the organization, 90% of the employees are hourly employees. Paylocity helps manage employee attendance, track hours worked, and handle time-off requests. It offers various methods for clocking in/out, tracks leave balances, and integrates with payroll for accurate and efficient time tracking. This was the major key benefit of this tool.

Paylocity isn't quite user friendly, it has a lot of complex features. It makes it harder for people who are new to HRIS systems to adapt to Paylocity.

Its mobile app is also not at all user friendly, freezes when I want to clock in and out for the day. For a better experience it is always better to be on the desktop.

Its integration with different job boards and career sites isn't quite wide. It has limited reach and if you want to reach out to a wider pool of candidates by posting a job it charges extra money which is not cost effective.

Paylocity offers a comprehensive suite of HR and payroll management tools in a single platform. It combines various functionalities, including payroll processing, benefits administration, time and attendance tracking, performance management, and more. This integrated approach allows organizations to streamline their HR and payroll processes and reduce the need for multiple software solutions. As a recruiter, I would prefer another tool over Paylocity but from an organization's point of view, this is a good investment where HR and payroll management tool is in a single platform.

The organization's needs and priorities and ensure if it aligns with their HR and payroll requirements. Also, the cost is a major factor, if the organization isn't in need of payroll software then it's better to consider other options as Paylocity sometimes can be a little expensive. Paylocity offers Payroll Processing Workflow, Employee Onboarding Workflow, and Time and Attendance Workflow.

If the organization is specifically looking for these then Paylocity is a great investment. Also if the organization has more hourly/contract workers rather than full-time employees then Paylocity is a great tool.

No significant changes since I started using the tool.

Paylocity is a great tool for hourly/contract-based employees who has to daily punch in and punch out for their work hours. So it is mainly ideal for an organization that has nonexempt employees rather than exempt employees.

The pros of using ADP are having an HRBP and a Payroll Advisor who works directly with you. The HRBP has been great at ensuring that we are following the proper guidelines for our HR-related issues. Having a payroll advisor gives us direct 1:1 support while doing payroll. It has also been great for updating our employee handbook, I love the way they make sure our policies are up to date as new policies develop.

We have been using ADP since 2017. As a small nonprofit organization, it was important to find a PEO. This helped with lowering the cost of benefits for our staff as well as managing our payroll. It has also provided us with endless HR resources.

When thinking about buying this tool, think about your company’s specific needs. Take into account the size of your company and what your expectations are. Be sure to have a budget that shows what your company will pay for benefits versus your employees. Think about what HR resources you are interested in (will you solely rely on ADP or will you also have in-house assistance)? Thinking about these things will help you when speaking with the representatives.

Over time we have been able to upgrade from Total Source to WorkForce Now. This has allowed us to have better reposting and made it easier on our accounts when submitting payroll. It has saved us a ton of time with spreadsheets. ADP is great at keeping you up to date on ungraded to their system. They have also evolved their MyLearning tool which provides a ton of training and now they have more live training and even in-person leadership training.

I feel like ADP can be useful for any size organization, it all depends on the needs. Whether it’s for part of the platform or the entire platform they have something to suit everyone’s needs.

I like that the process and layout is very similar regardless of which product and service you use from them - quite intuitive. It supports employers ability to maintain compliance by listing out requirements and flagging missing items or expired items. Lastly, being able to file 1099s digitally is a luxury I hadn't had previously. A total time saver.

We implemented Deel initially as a way to pay our onshore 1099 contractors, track their contracts and contact information outside of our HRIS. After two years, we had a new problem to address and changed our Deel platform to include an EOR. We had offshore contractors that we wanted to bring on as full-time employees to retain them and ensure compliance with the IRS. The change was seamless and the EOR is intuitive, informative and our offshore employees have been satisfied with the service from their end.

I think there is room to improve the connection between employer and the EOR service representatives in that a dedicated point-of-contact that is in house with Deel and not an international partner. Another consideration for EOR is having to pay a month's salary deposit up front for payroll is not ideal for cash flow. Lastly, I would love to see more employee and contractor features that you might find on a traditional HRIS because I believe it would be a better and more enriched experience for them.

For 1099 contractor management, oftentimes you use an ERP or accounting SaaS which has limitations. Deel bridges the gap between accounting SaaS/ERPs and an HRIS. For EOR, Deel is middle of the road in value. It is a great option for smaller OPEX budgets, but there are other EOR companies who offer more desirable features and better in-house service partners.

Consider the number of contractors or employees you would need for the upfront and annual costs to be justified. Whether or not you are familiar with global payroll, consider how much compliance support you need or is desirable for you. Lastly, consider whether you are up to converting your local currency to the international currency. Deel does not currently offer this in the employee profile, they only show the employee's local currency.

There is better customer service and help tutorials. Further, I have found there is an increase in the amount of educational materials available through Deel in order to stay current on contractor and global payroll trends and compliance.

I have known it to be used by HR and Finance professionals alike. Payroll administrators, regardless of where they fall organizationally, will find this tool beneficial. I believe organizations where these contracts or payrolls are relatively straightforward can benefit. Running payroll and paying invoices takes 10 mins or less per pay period.

• Rippling allows for organizational growth while providing flexible options to manage various HR and payroll functions.
• The chat support feature provides quick responses for most inquiries without requiring a phone call or ticket submission.
• The payroll and benefits modules are robust, allowing organizations to automate much of the process.

We purchased Rippling to streamline our processes. As a small organization, we primarily relied on physical copies of employee documents. We transitioned to Rippling about seven months ago.

Previously, we used ADP for payroll processing, but due to the size and needs of our organization, ADP was not a good fit. Rippling provided a more flexible solution that aligned better with our operational requirements.

• When issues require escalation to a specialist, response times can be very slow, often taking 5–7 days or longer.
• The documents module needs improvement, particularly in allowing multiple employees to access the same file and enabling employees to upload their own documents, such as course certificates or TB risk assessment results.
• The platform can become expensive, as additional modules, such as talent acquisition management and extra workflows, come at an added cost.

Rippling has a robust system with strong integrations, and its modules are built within the platform rather than being a collection of separate acquired tools, like ADP. I prefer its benefits and time-off modules because they are easy to update and manage.

However, the performance management, documents, and payroll sections can be challenging, requiring either manual work or additional paid features to achieve desired results.

Company size is a key factor to consider. After using Rippling for several months, I believe it is better suited for larger organizations. Cost is another consideration, as it is more expensive than options like BambooHR but still slightly more affordable than ADP.

The system offers numerous features, which can be overwhelming, so organizations should focus on their specific needs and choose a solution that simplifies their processes.

Since I started using it, Rippling has introduced a few new features in the documents section. However, I have not observed any major improvements.

Larger organizations with complex needs will find Rippling useful.

The interface is slick and easy to use. It offers flexible and expandable HR and benefits tools, meaning it can grow with the business. The streamlined and partially automated PTO with self-service is also good.

We bought OnPay to streamline our payroll process. Our HR and finance teams were too small and preoccupied with rapid growth activities to manage payroll, and as a result, mistakes were being made. The monthly payroll process was analog, without much automation, and quite inefficient and laborious. We wanted to have a more automated and online process, which OnPay provided.

OnPay is genuinely focused on small businesses. The interface is clean and simple, not overloaded with features like those found in big company payroll tools. It connects directly with our timesheets, allows staff to update their personal data, and has streamlined and mostly automated our payroll process. We have used this tool for a couple of years.

The design is a little boring and old-fashioned. The reporting section is a bit awkward to use. It doesn't have great support for international customers.

The design is a little boring and old-fashioned. The reporting section is a bit awkward to use. It doesn't have great support for international customers.

Can you also pay contractors through the system? Can you pay staff according to different pay schedules?

We haven’t used it long enough to answer this.

US-based SMEs without international offices can benefit from OnPay.

UKG is user friendly. It enables my team to self-manage the tools within the system. It also helps hiring managers with bias awareness.

My company has used UKG for over 2 years. We wanted a system that would enhance the recruitment process experience. I have used the system for almost 2 years and the key benefits I enjoy is that it has been a repository for my diversity, equity, and inclusion strategy that all managers can share with their teams.

Sometimes there are small glitches in the system that need technical support. I wish the pricing was cheaper. I have not been able to launch directly into timesheet mode.

I have not used many other tools as this, however, I do like the tools that uses inclusive language to review job descriptions. It recommends specific adjectives in job postings.

People should think about what they really want to accomplish with this tool (i.e., talent management, payroll, ease of integration, etc.). Ask yourself about the level of self-service you want this product to deliver. Does it deliver what you need?

I have only used the product for less than two years and currently cannot compare if it has changed or evolved over time.

Technology industry

1. Namely offers excellent benefits brokerage and administration, making it easy to manage employee benefits.
2. The customer service provided by Namely is outstanding, with quick and helpful responses to our needs.
3. The onboarding process for new employees is streamlined and efficient, reducing the time and effort required to bring new hires on board.

My organization plans to expand in the next two years, and we were looking for an HRIS software that is manageable for both supervisors and employees. We needed a system that could effectively track new employees throughout their tenure with the organization, and management agreed that we required software capable of scaling as we grow. After going through a thorough selection process with various HRIS companies, we found it challenging to choose the best fit for our organization. However, we were impressed that the team at Namely answered all of our questions and provided excellent guidance during the implementation process. We have been using Namely for about one year, and we are very satisfied with it so far.

1. Uploading form templates into Namely can be challenging, requiring additional time and effort.
2. The ability to add e-signatures to documents is limited, which could be improved for better functionality.
3. Making edits within the platform can sometimes be difficult, causing frustration when changes are needed.

I like that Namely is good for small and mid-size companies just starting their HR Department. They don't oversell products like some other HRIS software - they give you what is needed.

When purchasing Namely, it's important to consider its functionality and whether it meets the specific needs of your organization. It is also essential to evaluate whether the pricing fits within your budget, especially if you are a new or smaller company. Namely’s capacity to grow with a company is a key advantage, making it a good option if your organization is planning on expanding in the near future.

Namely has evolved to be very user-friendly for both employees and administrators, making it easier to navigate and use on a daily basis.

Namely is particularly well-suited for small to mid-sized companies looking for a comprehensive HRIS solution that can grow with their needs.

1. Ability to have all of our offerings under one system.

2. The user experience is easy to navigate and has a modern feel and approach.

3. The system allows for a ton of customization by the customer meaning a lot of configuration can be done without the support of Workday directly to meet your needs.

Our organization purchased Workday to bring all of our previous systems under one offering. We had four different vendors supporting our HR needs at the time and we were able to bring everything under Workday.

Our previous HRIS was lacking updates that supported our team's needs and we wanted to offer an experience to employees internally that was easy to navigate and understand. Workday is easy to use, understand, and looks and feels very modern.

Also, they allow us to have payroll, recruiting, onboarding, performance, training/compliance, etc. all under one offering. Personally, I have used Workday since the fall of 2019.

1. Everything is tied to one system meaning you are glued to the ecosystem making it hard to make a switch in the future, if needed.

2. The amount of customization available is a ton making it at times hard to understand for more complex business processes.

3. The cost. It's an amazing system, but the cost is steep if that is a concern.

Overall, it's different in that everything is able to be under one offering. It's amazing to have the ability to customize your Workday for what the organization needs and it's great that they only release two updates a year for system updates.

The updates are also pushed out to all Workday customers at the same time so everything is working off the same version, unlike other offerings we've used. The ease of use and modern feel is also much different from many of its competitors. It's a great offering!

Overall, when looking at an HRIS like Workday, it's important to consider whether you are looking for a system that can house all your offerings under one system - truly, that's the benefit of getting Workday.

If your organization does not want/need that, you could find alternative options that likely could offer a great experience at a more reasonable cost.

However, for our organization, this was something we needed, and have found great value in offering to create a better experience with more efficient processes.

Workday releases two system updates a year and they are pushed out to every customer at the same time. We have seen so many good updates since we implemented Workday and many of their updates come directly from Workday Community where Workday customers give feedback and ideas for recommended system changes.

For example, there have been significant improvements to the recruiting offerings in managing requisitions, which has really helped our team more efficiently manage requisitions. Another example is when Workday added COVID vaccine tracking very quickly to meet the needs of customers when the government was requiring employers to track vaccinations.

This was outside of the normal twice-a-year releases, which was really appreciated so we were in compliance. They care, listen, and make updates when needed to support their customers.

From my experience, Workday is great for larger organizations because it's such a robust offering. If you are a smaller organization, it may be a bit overwhelming and the expense may be hard to justify.

However, if you are looking for an offering that can be a one-stop shop for everything, offer an easy to navigate experience for staff, and the ability to customize the system for your needs, Workday is great!

• It has a modern, user-friendly interface that is very intuitive.
• Every section of BambooHR is customizable.
• It consolidates payroll, HR, benefits, and performance management in one place.

We were using Heartland Payroll Solutions when I joined the team, which was a terrible platform. BambooHR came highly recommended by our new CRO at the time, who had used it before. We wanted a more user-friendly system for both administrators and employees that would also allow us to pay contractors and process all company benefit packages. We also liked that BambooHR offers hiring and performance review options.

• It doesn't allow you to add a fixed semi-monthly amount for contractors who are not charging hourly rates, requiring you to create an hourly rate and manually adjust hours when running payroll.
• We've had minor issues with pay periods when a weekend and holiday fall together, causing the system to prompt us to run payroll before the pay period has ended. While there are workarounds, it's stressful and inconvenient.
• Employees have reported that the time-tracking feature on the BambooHR app doesn't always work correctly, requiring me to adjust their hours. I have brought this to BambooHR's attention, but since it doesn't seem to be a widespread issue, it may be user error on our employees' part.

I have some minimal experience with Gusto, which I liked well enough. However, compared to our previous payroll provider (Heartland Solutions), the difference is night and day. Heartland was slow, not user-friendly, and had very few integrations. Everyone in our company was happy when we switched to BambooHR. It has definitely made my job as an HR manager much easier.

Consider your main goals. I think BambooHR is reasonably priced for what it offers. The yearly cost is based on a variable monthly fee that depends on the number of employees, whether they use time tracking, etc. It usually amounts to $216 per month.

BambooHR also offers many add-ons that can increase the subscription cost, such as a Slack-style platform and a Community feature, which we do not use.

I recommend discussing pricing and features with the platform representatives to ensure it aligns with your budget. Also, consider the other services and benefits you offer and whether you want them integrated into your HR platform. BambooHR is designed to be an all-in-one HR solution.

We have only been using it for 1.5 years, but they are constantly adding new features. They also send out frequent newsletters with downloadable HR guides.

We are a relatively small startup (<50 employees), so I’m not sure how BambooHR would work for a very large organization. It is well-suited for dynamic, tech-forward companies, as it requires some customization on the user's end. It feels very much like a Millennial/Gen Z platform.

• Billing: Paycor billed per employee at an agreed-upon rate.
• Onboarding: The user-friendly process made it easy for new hires.
• Reports: The system provided the ability to run reports or request custom reports from a Paycor representative.
• Support: A dedicated representative was available, along with a support team if the primary rep was unavailable.

My organization purchased Paycor because it provided solutions for payroll and HRIS, including applicant tracking, onboarding, benefits, open enrollment, and performance management. I used Paycor for three years.

As the payroll administrator, I worked with Kronos to migrate biometric data (clock-in/out punches) into Paycor to process payroll. Additionally, I entered bi-weekly bonus payouts.

With Paycor, I also established a paperless open enrollment process and transitioned to an online platform. Paycor representatives assisted in setting up benefit vendor accounts for direct feed when payroll was processed, ensuring vendors received payment for employee benefits.

• System Issues: There were challenges with direct feed processing to vendors for payments.
• Support: The frequent turnover of dedicated reps made it difficult to establish continuity. Once we became comfortable with a rep, they would leave, requiring us to repeatedly acclimate new representatives to our business operations.
• Reports: The system did not allow data to be frozen in time for reporting. For example, if I ran a job title or salary report for 2003, it would display current data rather than historical information from that year.

The company transitioned from Paycor to Paycom. I prefer Paycom because it provides accurate historical reporting and has more consistent support staff.

Gather clear input from the departments that will use the tool the most to ensure it meets their needs. Ask the sales representative detailed questions—if they frequently need to check with someone else, they may not be knowledgeable enough about the product. Request a demonstration in demo mode to confirm that the tool will meet expectations and solve your specific challenges.

I have not used Paycor since the company transitioned to Paycom. However, since they are still in business, I assume they have made updates and continue to serve satisfied customers.

Paycor is well-suited for small to medium-sized companies with up to 150 employees.

The UI is clean, intuitive, and (mostly) easy to use. I very seldom had issues with automated processes. They make onboarding new employees incredibly simple. I also really like the friendly tone of the brand's "voice." The marching pig on the loading screen that changes with the seasons never gets old; it still sparks joy each time, even after all these years!

I have used Gusto since 2018 in 3 different early-stage tech startups. Gusto has a reputation as the go-to in Silicon Valley incubators and accelerators, although I've seen Rippling gradually gaining market share in the past few years. In all 3 cases, we selected Gusto because of their breadth of services. Gusto makes it easy to set up everything our organization needed to begin hiring and paying employees. What's nice about Gusto is that it makes processes that are intimidating to many founders into a "set it and forget it" task. Automating payroll, benefits, filing government forms, and quarterly taxes helped free up time for our founding team to focus on a growing set of other responsibilities.

Gusto's benefits department is unresponsive and it's nearly impossible to get answers from support about even simple benefits questions.

I have seen quite a few concerning errors across the platform (mostly with benefits), including employees not being enrolled in benefits programs, dismissed employees not being removed from benefits programs, incomplete COBRA enrollment, and late tax filings.

The information from Support is unreliable and often inaccurate.

The dismissal payroll workflow is misleading and we've had a few serious problems as a result.

When a Gusto admin is dismissed, their admin privileges are not removed automatically, which is a serious privacy concern.

I wish Gusto made it easier to set up a business entity in new states. They partner with a company called CorpNet, but I found the level of service wasn't worth the price and went back to handling state registration myself.

I love Gusto's friendly casual-but-professional tone compared to other providers in the space.

Gusto is best for small teams, the smaller the better. It is a great option for founders and single-person People teams who have less time to dedicate to payroll, benefits, and compliance. It makes many benefits available and affordable for small groups that would not have the numbers to access plans through traditional providers.

Gusto becomes less useful as a team grows and compensation & benefits become more complex. I would definitely recommend Gusto to founders, but I recommend moving off of their benefits platform as soon as you have a full-time person to manage benefits administration. Its payroll functionality is solid, but payroll administrators should be aware that they will get limited guidance from the Gusto support team.

Gusto's functionality has grown over the time I've used the platform as they've added additional features and integrations. However, the accuracy and quality of support have suffered over time. I used to be a Gusto evangelist, but these days I recommend that growing companies move off of Gusto as soon as is practical. New features have become less useful over time, and I wish they would focus on maintaining the quality of their core product rather than trying to expand into new services.

Company founders or admins inexperienced in payroll and benefits. Very small teams with a single person managing payroll and benefits administration among many other HR responsibilities.