10 Best Employer of Record (EOR) Services in 2024

The first thing that we love is Deel HR is free! Not only is it free, it still offers all the bells and whistles of your typical paid platforms. I like that you can use Deel as the employer of record for international employees. Deel ensures we are compliant with local labor laws. Deel HR has replaced our need to purchase an HRIS system to serve as our employee management system.

We purchased Deel because we were seeking an affordable HR tool for our startup company. We were experiencing pain in the areas of documentation management, managing employee files on multiple databases, and wanted to streamline our operations. We were also seeking an onboarding solution that could integrate with our recruitment process. Deel has helped us centralize our HR functions and improve our efficiency in managing employee data and onboarding new hires.

The cost for the employer of record is very high for a startup company. This is an amazing solution to offer for a growing company, but I wish the price was lower or split into two payments across the month. Although it is easy to navigate, the UI could be nicer.

Deel is a one-stop shop for domestic and international hires. They have a built-in background check and visa and EOR in one platform. Other platforms require the use of multiple tools to accomplish these tasks.

First, they need to consider their hiring needs. Determine how many international hires annually to be able to do a cost-benefit analysis. They also need to have a defined hiring workflow to determine if Deel has everything they need to enhance their existing workflow.

Deel has done a great job with API and adding new integrations as the market evolves.

Global and domestic organizations of all sizes.

Customer service is exceptional; you really feel that they are part of your team. I also loved the guarantees of local compliance, which created great trust with our in-house auditors. The ability to see the big picture of our workforce globally was also crucial, as it provided a great understanding of the workforce map and enabled strategic moves on the people side of things.

I was setting up PapayaGlobal for one of my previous clients. The reason we needed a tool like this was that we wanted to hire talent from different countries. Previously, we bypassed this by hiring on a "contractor agreement," but we really wanted employees, not contractors. While managing paperwork for EU candidates was somewhat easier, when it came to hires from outside the EU, it was a bit of a nightmare. Our HR team had to learn local employment laws, and we even contacted local lawyers to send us an empty contract so we could be fully compliant. These were the pains that the service greatly alleviated. We saved a lot of time, and audits were less stressful. We used it for about two years, but then the business took another direction.

It took a long time to learn the navigation through the platform; you really need to invest time to learn everything—you cannot just jump in with no training. Sometimes the screen would not load properly; words were overlapping, and it took some reloads for it to work, which was disappointing for a service that charges so much. We also had some issues with invoices; it was not clear how to manage them, but customer service helped with that.

Compliance support and global presence are the main reasons we chose PapayaGlobal. Another key factor is the customer service, which was consistently excellent. I also enjoyed the real-time access to analytics, which was helpful in following trends and monitoring important metrics globally.

First, consider the cost and how the pricing is structured to determine how much value a company can derive from the service at the agreed price point. Another important factor is access to real people who can guide the onboarding and integration with existing tools, which was commendable. Additionally, global access to local labor laws is perhaps the biggest consideration.

PapayaGlobal has evolved, but I believe other platforms have caught up and may be more attractive in their pricing.

PapayaGlobal is great for rapidly scaling businesses that need support in managing a multinational workforce.

I love how quickly we can set up a contract in a completely new country. The interface is intuitive, and setting up a contract takes less than five minutes. It is also no longer necessary for us to double-check the local labor laws against the contract, as they have local lawyers ensuring compliance. For example, the system does not allow you to input a number of holidays lower than the country's legal requirement, which is pretty nifty.

It has become increasingly difficult to employ people in other countries, especially China. Due to local employment laws, we were spending a lot of resources and time putting together job offers. We also needed to ensure local people that our obligations to local law were done by the book. We are still using Multiplier several months later. With the expansion of the business, we will likely use it even more.

I would like there to be a better overall HR manager system, where we can manage everything with different levels of management access. Also, I wish there were more personalized configurations that could specifically tailor to the business. A more custom onboarding would be superb and a slightly less robust package. Additionally, the price is a bit high for a startup trying to hire in countries with lower salary rates, which kind of defeats the purpose.

Multiplier is user-friendly, and onboarding is super quick. I didn't expect the platform to provide access to a benefit management program, which was a pleasant surprise. Overall, it combines contracting, benefits, and PTO management all in one place. It literally cut my working hours in half. It is excellent.

Definitely consider the price. The pricing makes sense if you are employing people with high salaries, but if you are hiring administrators from a low-income country, the platform may not be cost-effective. You can get a discount if you bulk purchase for more than five people. The price is per person per month. Another thing to consider is its simplicity; the platform is very easy to use, practically immediately. Finally, consider the effort you would need to figure out employment laws in countries where laws are constantly changing; this tool will save you from some headaches.

Not much, although they have promised the HR section is developing and will be rolled out in full capacity soon.

Startups and scaleups. Multiplier is great for companies that are global and starting out, but not for big ones that already have entities in different countries. It is also suitable for scaling companies that do not yet have in-house HR and legal teams.

The platform was easy to onboard new employees, and select and edit all personal and employment details. Employees and Contractors were paid timely and we never ran into any payroll issues of people not being paid on time. We had monthly calls with our Account Rep who was always willing to step in to escalate or help answer any questions we had or anything that came up that was employee specific.

Our org purchased the platform so we could pay and offer benefits to our international employees. I used Remote for just under 2 years. We had over 50 employees in 5-10 different states and using this platform allowed us to offer benefits in those local countries, along with any other country-specific benefits that in some cases we were required to offer. Remote also served as our EOR, employer of record, and provided legal protections related to employee terminations. All international employees and contractors were onboarded into the platform at hire and could access their portal at any time.

There was no reporting function. There would be payroll reconciliations each month, sometimes there was a payment due to us and other times we underfunded accounts, this posed problems with forecasting and budgeting for our finance team. It was unclear and not detailed on employee pay stubs to see what the benefits breakdown was for employees and employers. Meaning who was covering what percentage or what amount was being paid by each party on a biweekly or monthly basis.

I know Remote is an EOR and not all international platforms are. Over the last year I used a different international platform and did prefer that over Remote. The functionality was built out more, support was more responsive and as the HR admin I had more control over the contracts and editing.

How many employees or contractors you are planning to hire internationally. Does Remote support those countries and in what way? What is your annual budget for an International HRIS tool? How do you want federal taxes to be withheld from international employees or contractors? Do you want to offer benefits to international employees? If so, what benefit tiers are you looking to offer, can Remote support your company goals.

Remote increased the number of countries they offered onboarding and hiring during the time I used the platform.

Companies looking to hire internationally and ones' where they do not want to be the Employer of Record and would prefer the HRIS have an entity in the countries you are looking to hire in and be the EOR.

1. The global integration was the key solution for us.
2. Managers can easily access HR legislation and policies relevant to their countries.
3. The platform simplifies hiring and payroll across different countries, providing a consistent experience for all employees.

The organization I worked for needed a global HR and payroll solution because we were setting up offices in India. We required a system that could seamlessly integrate across all offices and provide a consistent employee experience, particularly regarding payroll. Remofirst was the most suitable option, meeting all our needs for global operations. It enabled us to pay employees in different countries according to their local currencies and offered a clean, user-friendly platform for all staff. The company has continued using Remofirst for the past 10 years.

1. There isn't much to dislike, but the cost may not be feasible for small businesses or startups.
2. Depending on your existing HR platforms, integration with Remofirst might take some time.
3. The tool may not be a good fit if you're not dealing with global operations.

Remofirst stands out due to its global presence and employer of record service. The platform's ability to manage employment contracts, recruitment, and payroll across different countries differentiates it from other solutions.

Consider whether you need a platform that can streamline HR functions globally. Remofirst is ideal for managing recruitment, payroll, and compliance with local legislation across multiple global offices.

Remofirst has made continuous improvements over time, focusing on enhancing user experience and expanding integration capabilities with other platforms. Their commitment to evolving their product based on user feedback has made the tool more adaptable and efficient.

Remofirst is best suited for established global companies. It excels in providing a streamlined service for organizations with multiple global locations, offering a consistent experience across all offices.

• I liked that Rippling provides robust reporting across their different functionalities.
• Rippling does a great job at making a user-friendly interface to navigate.
• I like that it has all the bells and whistles you need for a small to medium sized business.

We started off using Gusto as our Payroll/HRIS. Our team grew from under 50 to about 110 in 6 months. Unfortunately, we quickly outgrew Gusto's Benefits, Reporting, and HRIS capabilities.

A nearly all-in-one system is difficult to find. Coming from Gusto, we knew we wanted to keep our benefits, payroll, and HR information in one system, with great functional reporting across these data points. This cross functional data helped us create great reports that helped us visualize our YoY growth, retention rates, benefit enrollment data, headcount, and much more.

• They nickel and dime every part of the platform, so you'll end up with hidden costs for unlocking parts of the platform that are usually included in others, and you'll end up with a larger cost than you originally thought. Ask for an upfront detailed overview of the costs of all the modules.
• Subpar customer service with not a lot of dedicated support.

Overall, it's a good competitor for small to medium-sized HRIS solutions because it includes HRIS/Payroll capabilities. They extend into all facets of HCM, but they do payroll, benefits, and reporting best. I appreciate they delve into different avenues, but a perfect all-in-one is impossible, so it's best to stay with what you're best at. In terms of an "all-in-one" solution, if your team is under <500 employees, it's a decent solution. The platform and company is still growing, so be patient with changes and bugs. But overall, 7/10 experience utilizing Rippling. They do listen to customers, advocate for change within the system, and move quickly.

• Budget - Rippling can start off inexpensive, but when you add the bells and whistles, it can get quite expensive. Make sure to ask what each module costs independently.
• Payroll Audience - If your population includes a significant population of hourly time keeping needs, this may not be the best platform. You can also integrate various time tracking tools as well.
• All-in-One - Unfortunately, there still isn't a perfect solution. It's important to know which modules to prioritize. If you care about your payroll, HRIS, and benefits admin in one, this is a good system for a small to medium-sized company.
• Customer Support - If you need significant customer support, Rippling may not be the best fit. It was a challenge getting a hold of our reps at times. For payroll support, you don't get a dedicated person so it can be a challenge. If you prefer to have white-glove service here, this may not be the best unless things have changed.‍
• App Integrations - Rippling is a closed environment, meaning you cannot create your own integrations. However, they do have a lot of APIs available for many of the largely popular apps/tools. Most of our tech stack was already aligned to what we used within Rippling so it wasn't too difficult, but it's a serious point to consider for things like your accounting system, time tracking system, expense management, etc.

Since the time we started utilizing Rippling, they have implemented significant changes to their platform. They added PEO services, global payroll, LMS, pulse surveys, and a few other new functionalities. They truly are innovating to become the all-in-one mid-enterprise platform.

I believe Rippling is great for companies under 500 employees with a predominantly salaried workforce. This tends to be more common in tech centered environments. Also when you have a lean team around Payroll/HR, it can be a great system to utilize.

It is very easy to use and responsive; everything is mostly self-explanatory, but when I have questions, getting answers is straightforward. Additionally, the site itself is clean and operates quickly.

We bought it because during the pandemic, we allowed employees to move abroad, and some decided to stay there. Our company was only registered in the US and had no plans for international expansion, so it made sense to use a company like Globalization Partners. We started using them in 2020 and have been using them since.

I can't recall any significant dislikes about them. However, every time you add a new country, there is a new fee, which isn't ideal, but I understand why it is structured that way.

For us, it was their expertise, reputation, and the range of countries they could serve that made the difference. It's also a one-stop-shop in many ways since they can handle everything in a single simple workflow when adding a new employee.

If you are hiring just a few people internationally, then it makes sense to use Globalization Partners. However, as your international workforce grows, it might become more cost-effective to manage these processes internally.

I can't think of any specific changes, but I know I receive emails all the time with updates and news from them.

They are great for smaller to medium-sized companies that have just a few employees overseas.

I appreciate its capability to handle the hiring process in nearly any country. It supports the hiring process by completing the necessary documentation. It provided the client with excellent support without requiring them to establish a business in that country.

A client purchased GoGlobal to expand their international hiring efforts more effectively. The software was impressive in terms of user capabilities and the organization of recruitment efforts. The system consolidated pay rates and provided the client with taxation details, even for unfamiliar currencies. Additionally, the system organized the required documentation for the recruitment process.

It is not available in all countries, though it covers most. According to the client, GoGlobal was expensive compared to other programs. Since you don't have to establish a company in that country, GoGlobal holds certain rights and powers that you won’t have as a business owner.

GoGlobal is different from other systems I've seen due to its structure and level of support. The system's ability to establish itself in other countries is beneficial for small businesses looking to grow internationally. Other systems do not offer the same level of access.

Anyone considering GoGlobal should assess their budget and future expansion plans. It is ideal for small businesses, but for mid-sized businesses, it could be more challenging as they expand.

I have not worked with the tool long enough to notice updates.

GoGlobal is best users are small to lower mid-sized companies as they expand. It would be a valuable resource for manufacturing companies or supply chain groups.

I like the user experience. I like that the platform takes a fun approach (not cookie-cutter). I really love that I can set up a page for each country we do business in but have all the pages in one portal.

Our organization had many pain points as a startup. We needed the flexibility to hire people outside of the US quickly. Oyster was super user-friendly and was a wonderful EOR for us. I can't say enough nice things about their product and people! I have personally used them for just over a year.

Cons of having an EOR (or a PEO) are that we have less control over growing costs year over year (especially benefits costs - you are pretty much stuck with their recommendations). Another disadvantage of Oyster is the detailed customization usually wanted in smaller businesses. The cost of the tool is also steep.

Oyster is different from Atlas, for example, in the user interface. Oyster is more fun to use! In HR, so much of what we do is serious, urgent, and complex - high stress. This tool makes the work a bit more enjoyable.

Do you need an EOR? Have you researched EOR versus PEO, and why is an EOR more of a fit for your company?

They seem to be making continual improvements. Not stagnant.

Oyster can be a great fit for a company with employees, contractors, or vendors in multiple countries worldwide.

I appreciate the efficiency Atlas brings to onboarding. Tailored paths for each employee's development, along with skill tracking, have been invaluable. Setting goals and providing regular feedback sessions is a strong point of Atlas. Its focus on the human experience, including employee well-being, makes it a desirable company to work for. This increases engagement and provides tools to enhance job satisfaction and commitment.

I have used Atlas for five years and find it to be one of the better programs I've used. We sought a solution to improve team collaboration during the hiring process. Atlas helped us eliminate inefficiencies in our interviewing by streamlining candidate tracking, which we previously managed with notes. It allowed us to adopt more advanced technology, addressing our time-consuming and sometimes unorganized onboarding process.

The cost is higher than other programs I've used. The setup process was complex and time-consuming. It lacked customization options to meet my company's specific needs.

The user interface is intuitive, allowing for smooth interaction. The algorithm is sophisticated and provides insightful data analysis. Customer support has been exceptional; they are helpful and informative. The mobile app accessibility is better than other programs I've used.

First, consider the cost and whether it is efficient for your company. I recommend thoroughly researching each tool that the software offers, as it may be too complex for smaller companies.

Atlas has significantly improved over the last three years, offering enhanced customization options and faster processing times. The program's performance has become smoother and more accessible.

Atlas is ideal for large companies that hire frequently, such as financial institutions.