We really enjoyed using the eNPS and engagement analytics, as they helped us understand employee needs and track trends over time.

We appreciated the research-backed surveys, which ensured our data was grounded in scientific methodology. Culture Amp also has a user-friendly interface and is easy to use.

Initially, we adopted Culture Amp to improve how we measure, understand, and act on employee engagement. We used it for two years before transitioning to Lattice due to the need for OKR functionality.

While we had it, it fulfilled its purpose, which was to help us understand employee sentiment, pull analytics, conduct surveys, and more. We used the analytics to improve employee engagement and leveraged the platform for performance reviews as well.

Culture Amp had some limitations with integrations and lacked built-in OKR functionality. The cost to add expanded features like advanced analytics was high.

As our company grew, Culture Amp no longer offered the features we needed, such as OKRs and more advanced analytics capabilities.

Culture Amp focuses on engagement, sentiment analytics, and research-backed surveys. I enjoyed using the platform, but our company eventually outgrew its offerings.

I recommend evaluating data depth, ease of use, and integration capabilities. Consider scalability and the cost of future modules, as additional features may require extra investment.

Culture Amp’s interface and analytics have become more intuitive and data-driven, supporting HR leaders in gaining actionable insights.

Culture Amp is well-suited for mid-sized organizations that prioritize employee engagement, feedback, and culture development.

• It is highly intuitive and easy to navigate, making it accessible for HR teams and managers across industries.
• It offers tailored templates for engagement, onboarding, diversity and inclusion, and performance reviews, allowing organizations to align feedback tools with their unique culture.
• It supports regular pulse surveys and anonymous responses, fostering honest communication and continuous engagement tracking.

I have been using the tool for the past three years, both in my current organization and in my previous one. It was primarily purchased for conducting exit interviews, pulse surveys, and other types of surveys.To my knowledge, the Performance Feedback feature has not been utilized by either organization.

Culture Amp offers features that go beyond what the Microsoft 365 suite provides, especially in the area of employee engagement and feedback collection.

• Some users mention missing integrations, such as with Outlook calendars, which can disrupt workflow automation.
• Reporting and customization options are limited compared to other tools.
• Although intuitive for many, some users feel the platform requires extensive onboarding to use effectively.

Culture Amp is known for its research-driven survey templates, developed with input from organizational psychologists.

Unlike some platforms that focus only on data collection, Culture Amp emphasizes closing the feedback loop by helping teams take actionable steps based on the data collected.

Look for analytics that go beyond simple data collection—features like Culture Amp’s Focus Agent help translate feedback into meaningful action. It’s also important to check if the system integrates smoothly with existing HRIS or calendar tools to minimize workflow disruption.

Ease of use, support for anonymity, and flexibility in survey design are other key factors to consider.

I'm not sure how it was initially, as I've only used it for the past few months.

Culture Amp is well suited for mid-sized to large companies that prioritize culture, employee feedback, and inclusion. It works best for people-focused teams.

• The main thing I liked about Culture Amp was the ability to run reports from the top level down to the direct manager. It was anonymous, but it gave us a realistic idea of how the team was doing.
• The second thing I liked about Culture Amp was its user-friendly interface. Employees were impressed with how easy and quick it was to complete the survey.
• A third thing I liked about the platform was the in-house tools. We utilized the action planning guide, and managers mentioned they appreciated that feature.

We bought Culture Amp because we had never conducted an engagement survey before. We wanted to start focusing on our culture and retention. We were experiencing a period of high turnover and needed to understand the reasons behind it.

The integration of Culture Amp was smooth, and our employees found it very user-friendly. I personally used it for two years.

• The biggest complaint I had was that it wouldn't let us customize it as much as we wanted. There were things we wanted to do but couldn't.
• We also wanted to delve deeper into some of the results.
• I don't really have a third con, but my HR team did have to spend extra time working with the reporting function to get the exact report we wanted.

I've only used a couple of engagement tools, but I liked Culture Amp. The surveys are simple to take, and our representative was always informative.

• When buying this type of tool, the first thing I think about is integration. Will it work with my current systems?
• People should also consider how easy it is to use from the employee’s perspective. If it’s difficult or time-consuming, many employees will not complete the survey.
• It's important to evaluate what type of reporting the tool provides and how detailed the reports can get.
• Cost is always a factor as well.

I'm not sure, as I only used it for two years.

I would say Culture Amp is suitable for medium to large-sized companies.