Greenhouse is a feature-rich applicant tracking and recruiting system for midsize and large companies that require advanced scheduling, customization, and a straightforward workflow.
Ratings
Ease of Use
Best For
Key Differentiator
Price
Free Trial
PROS
- Greenhouse's onboarding feature is built and executed well. New hires transition smoothly from candidate to employee.
- iOS and Android apps work well for recruiters on the go. Users can review applications, schedule interviews, view candidates' profiles, and more.
- 450+ third-party integrations.
CONS
- Greenhouse’s pricing is undisclosed, and they do not offer a trial version.
- Some users note that reporting customization is quite limited and difficult to navigate.
- In-person/live support could be improved.

Need Help? Talk to an HR Software Advisor!
Tell us more about your company & an HR Software Advisor will help you find the right software








Greenhouse is one of the leading applicant tracking and recruiting software ideal for medium and large-sized companies. It allows you to:
- Share jobs across hundreds of job boards
- Encourage existing employees to refer candidates through dedicated referral programs
- Customize and automate applicant tracking pipelines
- Track and optimize your sourcing strategy with data-driven reports.
We like that Greenhouse takes diversity hiring into consideration with measures to reduce unconscious bias. The platform primes interviewers with reminders during key moments in the hiring process. These reminders are intended to keep the evaluation process focused on empirical qualifications and nothing else. Users can also require the interview panel to explain and justify their ratings to promote transparency and fairness.
To see the hiring process through to the finish line, Greenhouse’s onboarding module equips users with customization and automation features. Offer letters can be personalized and then sent out automatically. The software also makes it easier for you to prepare a thoughtful welcome for the new hires to get them familiar with the company’s culture and colleagues.
Greenhouse is a solid ATS that will provide excellent value to medium and large companies. For the most part, it succeeds in its attempt to drive engaging candidate interactions and streamline administrative tasks. Some potential customers will be turned off by their lack of transparent pricing, but for those who can afford it and will use all of its features, we highly recommend this platform.

I use Greenhouse daily for recruiting tasks. It helps streamline the hiring process by integrating with LinkedIn and centralizing key workflows such as job postings, applicant reviews, and interview scheduling.
If a candidate is not the right fit for a particular role, the Referral feature allows them to be considered for other suitable positions. The Rating feature enables interviewers to score candidates, making it easier to compare and evaluate applicants. Overall, Greenhouse keeps the entire recruiting process organized and efficient.
- Greenhouse consolidates multiple recruiting functions, such as job postings and resume reviews, into a single platform.
- The user-friendly interface makes it easy to navigate and train new recruiters or hiring managers.
- The platform provides how-to videos and tutorials that assist with training and onboarding.
My company needed a centralized system to manage all recruiting-related tasks efficiently. Greenhouse provides a streamlined platform that simplifies the hiring process by allowing recruiters to post jobs, review resumes, and manage candidate interactions in one place.
One of its key benefits is its integration with LinkedIn, which expands the candidate pool and enhances outreach efforts. Additionally, the platform offers a mobile app, making it easier for applicants to apply from anywhere. I have personally used Greenhouse for [X amount of time], and it has significantly improved our ability to track and manage candidates throughout the hiring process.
- Once a rating (scorecard) is created, it is difficult to modify, which can be an issue if interview questions change.
- The initial setup of the system was challenging, making it harder to establish streamlined processes at the beginning.
- A more straightforward implementation process would improve the user experience.
Greenhouse stands out because it integrates multiple recruiting functions into a single platform, eliminating the need for multiple tools. This all-in-one approach makes it more efficient compared to other systems that may require additional integrations to achieve the same functionality.
The cost of the system is a key factor, as pricing varies depending on the number of employees. It is important to assess whether the tool will address workflow challenges and improve efficiency. Greenhouse offers a variety of recruiting features in one system, making it a strong option for organizations looking to streamline their hiring processes.
Greenhouse has introduced new features, such as the Event Calendar, which enhances scheduling and recruitment event management. This demonstrates the platform's commitment to continuous improvement and adapting to user needs.
Greenhouse is ideal for companies with frequent hiring needs, especially those that manage a high volume of applicants and require a structured recruiting process.
Smaller companies that hire infrequently may not find Greenhouse cost-effective or necessary for their recruiting needs.
We were changing the way we managed our recruiting process. In Talent Acquisition, I worked with Greenhouse on a daily basis to ensure our recruiting campaigns ran smoothly.
My main interaction with Greenhouse is creating and posting job opportunities, creating detailed job descriptions, and optimizing them for different job boards. I also used the platform to track incoming applications, review candidate profiles, and work with hiring managers to evaluate and develop candidates through the selection process.
Another important aspect of my workflow involved scheduling and coordinating teams and interviews within Greenhouse. Not only did this save a lot of time, but it also helped maintain clear communication between interviewers, candidates, and stakeholders. In addition, the platform's interview feedback and scoring features helped me pool the opinions of different team members and accurately assess a candidate's suitability.
What I really liked about Greenhouse was the intuitive and user-friendly interface which makes it very easy to navigate and manage our hiring process efficiently. The platform's customizable workflow and interview stages allow us to tailor the hiring process to the unique needs of each role, ensuring a more personalized candidate experience. Additionally, advanced reporting and analytics capabilities provide valuable insights that allow us to refine strategy, optimize work, and make data-driven decisions, ultimately leading to more successful recruiting. Overall, Greenhouse's seamless integration of applicant tracking, collaboration tools, and powerful insights has significantly increased our hiring potential and made it an indispensable tool in our talent pool.
I used Greenhouse at a previous employer. The decision to acquire Greenhouse was driven by an urgent need to simplify and improve the hiring process. Before adopting Greenhouse, we faced significant challenges in managing large numbers of applicants, tracking their progress, and getting all teams involved in the hiring process to work together effectively. These often resulted in delays, misunderstandings, and a lack of understanding of the entire recruiting pipeline.
Greenhouse provides a comprehensive solution to address these vulnerabilities. An intuitive applicant tracking system not only helps us centralize applicant information, but also allows us to automate various stages of the hiring process. This automation significantly reduces manual administrative tasks, allowing our HR and recruiting teams to focus more on engaging with candidates and making informed decisions.
While I've found Greenhouse to be an invaluable tool, I think there are a few areas that could be improved. First, while the reporting interface is powerful, it could benefit from more customizable visualization options to suit our specific reporting needs. Second, while the platform is good at managing individual job postings, I wish there were more seamless features for managing multi-role or bulk hiring programs. Finally, improving the functionality of the mobile app will facilitate mobile access and quick updates when away from the desktop interface. Despite these minor shortcomings, Greenhouse remains a great asset to our recruiting efforts.
Due to its exceptional user experience, easy customization choices, and data-driven insights that produce superior hiring results, Greenhouse distinguishes out significantly from its rivals. The interface of Greenhouse is extremely intuitive compared to other solutions, which makes it simpler for our team to embrace and use efficiently. We can customize the hiring process to meet our specific needs thanks to its flexible processes and interview phases, which offer an unmatched level of personalisation. Furthermore, Greenhouse stands out for its analytics capabilities, which provide thorough information on candidate progression, sourcing, and performance indicators that allow us to hone our tactics for ongoing improvement. Although I've used tools like this before, Greenhouse stands out for its focus on the candidate experience and collaborative hiring. Our recruitment efforts have been greatly expedited by its easy-to-use interface and powerful collaboration tools. Greenhouse succeeds in these categories, giving us the tools we need to make strategic decisions and improve our hiring methods, whereas other solutions frequently fall short in these areas.
The selection of an HRIS/ATS technology like Greenhouse should be based on a number of important factors. The technology must be scalable and flexible in order to allow your organization to expand and react to changing requirements. The solution should smoothly interact with your current systems, improving data flow. Integration capabilities and user-friendliness are crucial; choose a solution that is simple to use and reduces your team's learning curve. Last but not least, thorough reporting and analytics are necessary to improve your hiring methods and make educated selections. Take these considerations in order to make sure you choose an HRIS/ATS that completely satisfies the current and future needs of your firm.
Over time, Greenhouse ATS has had a remarkable transformation, continually meeting user requests by integrating useful features and improvements. Greenhouse has aggressively sought user feedback from its start, resulting in a never-ending cycle of advancements. Regular platform updates that provide cutting-edge features like configurable processes, AI-powered candidate recommendations, and sophisticated analytics tools are clear signs of the platform's progress. Because of its dedication to adjusting depending on user feedback, Greenhouse is able to efficiently meet the changing and dynamic needs of the modern recruitment scene and maintain its leadership position in applicant tracking systems.
For firms that place a high priority on a simplified and data-driven approach to talent acquisition, Greenhouse ATS is ideally suited. It excels for medium-sized to large businesses with intricate employment requirements involving numerous teams and stakeholders. It is the best option for businesses looking for specialized hiring procedures across multiple jobs and departments due to its adaptable workflows and interview stages. Additionally, its extensive reporting and analytics capabilities serve firms who are data-focused and wish to optimize their plans. In short, Greenhouse is the ideal choice for businesses looking for a complete, scalable solution that enables them to quickly make educated hiring decisions.
While Greenhouse ATS is a great option for many firms, it might not be the greatest solution for startups or small companies with modest employment requirements and resources. The platform's extensive features and capabilities can be too much for businesses with smaller candidate pools and less complicated hiring procedures. Additionally, some collaboration tools might be less useful for firms that frequently use distributed or remote teams. In certain circumstances, a simpler and lighter approach can be preferable.
Every company is different, but we typically approve the headcount outside of Greenhouse with finance and then use the greenhouse approval system to check that everything is correct before posting. From there, we use it as our central hub to post jobs, most are auto-linked to job boards, but I like that we can create custom links for unique situations like sharing a posting to a specialty board. From there, we can handle all resume reviews, scheduling and conducting interviews, offer approvals, and offer letter creation and sending. What is nice is Greenhouse integrates with our HRIS, so once an offer is accepted, we can export the candidate data directly to the HRIS.

Greenhouse is very customizable; I like that we can adjust our rejection reasons, scorecards, email templates, etc. I appreciate that it is very self-contained, meaning with the right integrations, you can pretty much do everything from within Greenhouse itself; you don't need to switch from different apps much. I also like their support; they have a robust self-help and self-guided support platform and very quick and helpful live support.
We had previously been using another ATS that did not allow for much customization of stages, rejection reasons, scorecards, etc. and did not have very robust reporting features. I like that Greenhouse has lots of integration partners, full customization options, and great pre-made reports with custom reporting options. I have been using it for over 5 years and have to say it is my favorite ATS.
There is not a lot I don't like about Greenhouse; I think it's a great ATS. One area I do prefer about some other ATS is the resume disposition flow; with Greenhouse, there is a pop-up every time you want to disposition a resume, and you have to select the reason every time from a dropdown, with some others, you can choose a reason for the first person and from there it just saves and stays the say unless you change it. While they do have a lot of integration partners, you are somewhat limited as well, for example with signatures, you only really have Docusign as a natural integration, so if you use anyone else then you are going to have to do offer letters manually outside the system.
Greenhouse is much more customizable. Some competitors don't allow you to make custom reports, custom rejection reasons, custom interview flows, custom approvals, etc. So for that reason, I much prefer Greenhouse whenever I enter a new Greenhouse environment. At the same time, it looks similar; it is entirely bespoke to the needs of that individual company.
Do you need an ATS yet? It is expensive, so I would consider how much hiring you are doing. Who will manage this and implement it? The implementation can be lengthy and requires a significant time investment; even afterward, you will need someone internally to work the system. Otherwise, it will quickly lose all order. Do I need all these features and customizations? If you don't, going for a cheaper alternative may make sense.
They have added a nice self-scheduling feature; it replaces the need to integrate Calendly for interviews. They often send feedback requests and surveys, so it is nice to know they always look for ways to improve. They send newsletters out to update any changes.
Someone who wants a customizable ATS with lots of features. You likely need to be rather comfortable with using different software to be comfortable in Greenhouse, it can be easy to be overwhelmed with the amount of things you can do with it.
If you do not have any dedicated recruiters or if you don't need lots of features or customization, then you likely don't need Greenhouse.

Greenhouse

Greenhouse

Pinpoint

Pinpoint

Workable

Workable

VidCruiter

VidCruiter

Spark Hire

Spark Hire
Small companies that operate on a conservative budget and hire infrequently are not a good match for Greenhouse. The best ROI for this product is experienced by mid to large-sized teams.
Greenhouse is used by over 6,500 companies, including HubSpot, DoorDash, Dropbox, and Wayfair.
- Candidate sourcing from job posting on 1000+ platforms, from well-known to niche. Data-driven reports, referral programs, and custom pipelines to optimize sourcing strategy.
- Focus on candidate experience with flexible scheduling, interview feedback surveys, and career pages
- Streamlined and customized onboarding helps new hires feel at home by providing resources to introduce colleagues and company culture.
- Besides the above, Greenhouse has features for collaborative hiring, reporting and analytics, tasks and alerts, mobile app, and diversity hiring tools.
Greenhouse offers three plans: Core (essential hiring tools), Plus (adds automation, advanced configuration, and deeper reporting), and Pro (enterprise-grade governance, security, analytics, and extensibility for complex, global hiring). Contracts are typically one-year prepaid subscriptions, with discounts for two or three-year prepaid agreements.
Medium to large-sized companies get the most out of Greenhouse.
Greenhouse has rolled out a series of updates in April and May 2025 aimed at enhancing user efficiency, improving data governance, and enhancing the overall candidate experience. These enhancements focus on giving recruiters more control through self-serve features, reducing scheduling friction, and ensuring more inclusive and streamlined workflows for both administrators and interviewers.
Key recent changes include:
- New filtering options on the My Interviews page
Interviewers can now filter by Timeframe, Candidate Name, and Job Title, making it easier to prepare for upcoming interviews and navigate busy schedules. - Bulk editing for departments and offices
Admins can now rename, archive, or reassign offices and departments without involving support — a major usability upgrade for distributed teams with evolving org structures. - Improved Data Protection configuration
Admins gained more flexibility to preview and manage custom terms of service and privacy policies, reinforcing compliance for GDPR and global hiring environments. - Enhancements to interview scheduling UX
Updates include a simplified time zone picker and a more intuitive display of candidate availability, making it easier for coordinators to avoid back-and-forth. - Pronoun visibility and inclusive messaging updates
Greenhouse made incremental updates to show pronouns in more areas of the app and adjusted default messaging for better inclusivity.
Greenhouse was founded in 2012 by Daniel Chait. Chait had previously founded a banking software startup, Lab49, and while managing it, he experienced first-hand the challenges of recruiting and realized the need for software to streamline it. After he sold his stake in Lab49 in 2011, he decided to focus his next business venture on recruiting tech, and Greenhouse was born.
Greenhouse supports over 6,500 customers today and has expanded beyond their New York HQ to have offices in San Francisco, Denver, and Dublin. The company has also won several awards over the last few years, including Inc. Magazine Best Workplace (2018 – 2022) and Glassdoor #1 Best Place to Work, Forbes Cloud 100, Deloitte Technology Fast 500, Inc. 5000, Crain's Best Places to Work NYC, and Mogul’s Top 100 Workplaces for Diverse Representation (2022).
Company HQ
New York, United States
Number of Employees
750+
Year Founded
2012
Amount Raised
Greenhouse has raised a total of $110.1M over 8 funding rounds as of July 2018.
FAQ
About SSR

We spend hundreds of hours researching the best HR and recruiting software so you don’t have to. We never take money from vendors during our research phase and rely heavily on practitioners and experts to help us recommend the right software. However we may earn a small fee if you click on vendor links on this page.












